WebHosting Policy- SSL (fwd)

[Juan R.]

Nambased Hosting is really not that difficult to imply if your running
apache, just a few config lines to modifie depending on the scale of your
hosting farm, plus alot of domains do not really need IP's for there domain.

Juan R.
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve" <steve at host-all.com>
To: "Joe DeCosta" <joe at decosta.org>; "Neil H." <neil-list at hostmysite.com>
Cc: <vwp at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: WebHosting Policy- SSL (fwd)


> I agree with you too, Joe. However, implementation of name based hosting
> will not be easy for the small hosters.. especially those running NT
farms.
> The only other concern I really see is accountability..  tier 1 providers
> like WorldCom will have tons of IP's at their datacenters while small
> Mom-and-Dad hosters will not be able to get them, thus creating a monoply
in
> IP based solutions over the short run; which, as we all know, leads to
long
> term gains.
>
> Steve Conzett
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe DeCosta" <joe at decosta.org>
> To: "Neil H." <neil-list at hostmysite.com>
> Cc: <vwp at arin.net>
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:58 PM
> Subject: Re: WebHosting Policy- SSL (fwd)
>
>
> > thank you! finally someone agrees with me!
> >
> > ______________________
> > Joe DeCosta
> > joe at decosta.org
> > ~Off to see the wonderful wizard of Oz!~
> > ~because of the wonderful things he does!~
>
>