Things that need to be addressed

[Bryan Socha]

I think both points are valid..  Why are why even looking at policy changes,
who these policy changes should effect and what exceptions are their to the
policy...

To start off what the exceptions should be...:
   - The blocking software, netnanny, etc..  Especially with the new bill up
for vote requiring all libraries to install blocking software or they will
not recieve government money for funding.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Jakominich's IMAP [mailto:genej at broadviewnet.net]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 6:29 PM
To: vwp at arin.net
Subject: Re: Things that need to be addressed


Why don't we work on a list of exceptions first.  I think that is the major
sticking point for most people.  Why don't we all make a list and send it to
the moderator?

What does everyone think?


-gene

-----------------------
Gene Jakominich Jr
Systems Engineer, ISP Operations
Broadview Networks
www.broadviewnet.net
------------------------


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Darte" <billd at cait.wustl.edu>
To: <vwp at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Things that need to be addressed


> >
> > Off the top of my head, here are some of the issues we need
> > to address:
> >
> > 1) Exceptions (SSL, POP/IMAP, etc)
> > 2) Accounting systems
> > 3) Legacy systems
> > 4) Net-nanny filters
> >
> > Let's start with those.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> Perhaps we could review the justification for the discussion first... I
> don't mean the principle of conservation...I believe we all agreed to
that,
> but rather the magnitude of the problem of IP addresses that would be
wasted
> if NO hosting policy were in place at all.
> 1. How many addresses ARE being used this way now and 2. what is the slope
> of the the utilization curve and 3. What are the potential impacts upon
that
> utilization rate in the next 3-5 years???
>
> Bill Darte
> ARIN AC  Washington University in St. Louis
>