Things that need to be addressed

[Gene Jakominich's IMAP]

Why don't we work on a list of exceptions first.  I think that is the major
sticking point for most people.  Why don't we all make a list and send it to
the moderator?

What does everyone think?


-gene

-----------------------
Gene Jakominich Jr
Systems Engineer, ISP Operations
Broadview Networks
www.broadviewnet.net
------------------------


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Darte" <billd at cait.wustl.edu>
To: <vwp at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Things that need to be addressed


> >
> > Off the top of my head, here are some of the issues we need
> > to address:
> >
> > 1) Exceptions (SSL, POP/IMAP, etc)
> > 2) Accounting systems
> > 3) Legacy systems
> > 4) Net-nanny filters
> >
> > Let's start with those.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> Perhaps we could review the justification for the discussion first... I
> don't mean the principle of conservation...I believe we all agreed to
that,
> but rather the magnitude of the problem of IP addresses that would be
wasted
> if NO hosting policy were in place at all.
> 1. How many addresses ARE being used this way now and 2. what is the slope
> of the the utilization curve and 3. What are the potential impacts upon
that
> utilization rate in the next 3-5 years???
>
> Bill Darte
> ARIN AC  Washington University in St. Louis
>