ARIN IPv6 Policy Proposed
Antonio Querubin
tony at lava.net
Mon Mar 12 15:04:32 EST 2001
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Member Services wrote:
> After a discussion concerning the IAB/IESG recommendation for IPv6 address
> space allocation on the ARIN IPv6 WG mail list, the ARIN Advisory Council
> is proposing that the following be the ARIN policy concerning IPv6 address
> space allocation:
>
> "ARIN will allocate IPv6 addresses according to the Internet Draft
> <http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iesg-ipv6-addressing-recommendations-00.txt>.
> This policy will be regularly reviewed and modified subject to operational
> experience."
The draft has the following recommendations:
1. Home network subscribers, connecting through on-demand or
always-on connections should received a /48.
2. Small and large enterprises should received a /48.
3. Very large subscribers could receive a /47 or slightly shorter
prefix, or multiple /48's.
4. Networks with a clearly expressed disinterest in subnetting
should received a /64.
5. Mobile networks, such as vehicles, cellular phones should
received a static /64 prefix to allow the connection of multiple
devices and, depending on the architecture, a /128 for a
MobileIP care-of address [MobIPv6].
6. Subscribers with a single dial-up node preferring a transient
address should received a /128.
Just some random thoughts on several of the above recommendations:
With regard to #1 I'm curious as to what constitutes a 'home network
subscriber' in this draft? Our experience with what we generally consider
home network subscribers to be is that none subnet at all. That being the
case, why assign a /48 when a /64 is quite adequate while still providing
the home user with full capability?
With regard to #2 most small organizations do not bother to subnet - they
generally use switches to divide up traffic. Subnetting requires routers
of which the majority aren't IPv6-aware anyway. Another alternative for
#2 would be to combine it with #3: small enterprises be assigned one or
more /64s while very large enterprises receive a /48. It seems to me that
we should use a SLA for it's intended purpose - that it be specific to a
'site'. But if sites are being assigned /48 where does that leave the
NLA?
It seems that #1 and #2 above could/should be qualified with having a
requirement to subnet or be geographically dispersed.
More information about the V6wg
mailing list