Still blah, blah, blah
Valdis.Kletnieks at VT.EDU
Valdis.Kletnieks at VT.EDU
Sun Mar 30 03:51:20 EST 1997
On Sun, 30 Mar 1997 01:25:23 CST, you said:
> 2. The yield is not 15 times. You show "$1m in"...above I show $50m in...
> and $15 million out, that is 30% return on the investment of $50m...
Umm.. Jim? In a previous life, did you ever work as an accountant for
a movie studio, computing percents of the net on movies so actors get
screwed out of money?
You have to keep "your" money and "their" money seperate when
computing return on investment. If you spend $1M to buy and run a
bakery, sell $50M worth of bread at $2/loaf, spend $35M on
flour and payroll, and get $15M in profits, you have about 1500%
profits.
Or at least until somebody else invests $1M to build another bakery,
and sells $37.5M of bread at $1.50 a loaf, starting a price war until
prices drop down to whatever $35.2M works out to a loaf, at which
point you've put in $1M of your money, taken in $35.2M, spent $35M of
it on flour and payroll, and kept $200K, for a 20% return or so.
Now, what you originally *said* was that since you'd be making $15M a
year, you arbitrarily set the "value" at 5X higher (or $75M), to give
a "yield" of 20%, and then made it a more conservative $50M. However,
the "value" is *NOT* the same thing as the actual money put in. You
actually put in $1M. Your customers paid you $16M. You pocket $15M.
Your other $49M is irrelevant. Otherwise, I could write myself a
check for $1,498M, put it in my pocket, and offer to do the job for
what would be essentially non-profit 0.0001% return on my investment,
since I'd only make $15M on my $1.5 billion....
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Engineer
Virginia Tech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 284 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/naipr/attachments/19970330/402f2363/attachment.sig>
More information about the Naipr
mailing list