past vs future use

[Gordon Cook]

Sigh!  relevant points.

evidently allocation and assignment of ip numbers are different.
evidently sect 3.1 is not intended to apply to isps.

now that I have begun to look a little more closely at this stuff, it is
NOT at all as clear as I would have hoped.

I hope that we will begin to have a discussion of some of these issues
over the next few days.  what's the address of pagn kim?  I am very
interested in your and the arin board and jon postels views on a range of
procedural issues.


************************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet               For subsc. pricing & more than
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA     ten megabytes of free material
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)              visit   http://cookreport.com/
Internet: cook at cookreport.com             On line speech of critics under
attack by Ewing NJ School Board, go to http://cookreport.com/sboard.shtml
************************************************************************


On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Jon Lewis wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Justin W. Newton wrote:
> 
> > The current Internic allocation policy appears to be that you need to
> > utilize 32 Class C's worth of address space effectively before they will
> > assign you a /19 address block.  As it seems that a /19 is currently the
> 
> That's not the impression I get from rfc2050.
> 
> [direct quote from the rfc]
> ---
> 3.1  Common Registry Requirements
> 
>    Because the number of available IP addresses on the Internet is
>    limited, the utilization rate of address space will be a key factor
>    in network number assignment.  Therefore, in the best interest of the
>    Internet as a whole, specific guidelines have been created to govern
>    the assignment of addresses based on utilization rates.
> 
>    Although topological issues may make exceptions necessary, the basic
>    criteria that should be met to receive network numbers are listed
>    below:
> 
>                 25% immediate utilization rate
>                 50% utilization  rate within 1 year
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> Based on this, I would think an ISP that is, or is about to be, multihomed
> and is currently completley (and efficiently) using at least a /21 worth
> of IP's and expects to fully utilize a /20 in about 1 year _should_ be
> able to apply for and receive their very own /19. 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
>  Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
>  Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
> ________Finger jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
>