changes on isp charge

Paul Ferguson pferguso at CISCO.COM
Tue Jan 28 17:16:46 EST 1997


Another shining example of noise. Have you even bothered
to read the proposal, read the 'recommended reading' list,
or try to learn about what you are oppossing? Obviously not.

*sigh*

- paul

At 09:28 AM 1/28/97 -0600, Lance Laureys wrote:

>The charges that are supposedly gonna be implemented for isp from 2500 to
>20,000 IS TOTALLY outrageous. There is ABSOLUTELY no reason as for these
>charges to take effect. Most all internet service providers can NOT just
>toss out 20,000 just like that, as it is hard for most all of us to keep
>going because of the growth of customers that are overwhelming each and
>every internet service provider such as mc.net. Online service provider
>themself could use that money to make a new system for just a few sites to
>get their customers satisfied.  As internic itself the current charges are
>reasonable but for the new charges the dramatic change is completely not
>necessary to any effect.
>
>~~~~~~~~ Email: Console or Wolf @mc.net
>~ WOLF ~ Lance Laureys
>~~~~~~~~ http://sunkiller.mc.net
>
>
>



More information about the Naipr mailing list