Comments on ARIN proposal
William Allen Simpson
wsimpson at GREENDRAGON.COM
Tue Jan 21 09:11:33 EST 1997
> From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
> What classes of membership would you suggest, and what would their different
> rights and privileges be?
>
We should follow the APNIC and RIPE models, with merely a "privilege" of
additional votes:
Membership is open to any person or organization that operates a
network or local registry, has registered or desires to register an
Internet address block, Autonomous System Number, or other value in
the range(s) assigned to this Registry, and has paid the appropriate
membership dues:
Membership dues shall be assessed annually, based on the
self-reported member size, by the following schedule:
rate vote recommended size
enterprise: $50 1 /21 or less
small: $800 2 /19 or less
medium: $6,400 3 /17 or less
large: $25,600 4 /16
super: $25,600 * N 4
In addition to the membership dues, an initiation fee shall be
assessed new Members that have not previously been allocated
any Internet address blocks, by the following schedule:
$1,000 each
Note, that's self-reported! Apparently, there is an issue with
requiring financial statements for APNIC or RIPE (or ISP/C), which use
income for the classes, and thus they decided on self-reporting.
In this case, widespread use of private non-global addresses [rfc-1918]
could alter the fee, and the member should be able to choose size.
And note the use of an initiation fee to provide for training expenses
(as both APNIC and RIPE), instead of inflated membership rates. There
was a _lot_ of support for splitting the initial training/education out.
WSimpson at UMich.edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
BSimpson at MorningStar.com
Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2
More information about the Naipr
mailing list