Reject the NAIPR

[The Innkeeper]

> > Maybe the web page didn't make it very clear, but the context of this
list
> > has certainly made it clear that the suggested pricing is only a first
> > draft proposal.
>
> But Michael, the web page is the only standard against which comments can
> be made.  Especially in light of the fact that many, clear and focused
questions
> that have been posted to this mail list have been ignored, answered
off-line, or
> dismissed with a hand-wave.  Dredging through back e-mail is not
acceptable.

The Web page should always be the first point of reference.......I think
that Kim needs be alleviated of some stuff here and let her concentrate on
this proposal!!!!!!


> Last week I posted a series of questions.  I tried my best to make them
non-
> flamatory and focused.  Except for an off-line telephone conversation
with
> Jerry Scharf (who knew me from my days at NASA) I basically received no
> answers other than a terse "read the RFC."
>
> Based on my experience with things of this ilk, updating and expanding
the web
> page should be "job one."  And not just for Kim, who I suspected is under
> excessive pressure as is, but by a dedicated team of "volunteers" from
the
> core team of those who claim to understand what is going on.
>
> Bob
> ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
> Bob Van Cleef, Systems Administration                      (408) 734-8100
> MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.                   FAX (408) 734-8177
> 255 Caspian Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1015       vancleef at microunity.com