RIPE, High Fees and Cronyism
jamie dyer
jamie at comet.net
Sun Jan 19 05:48:55 EST 1997
My apologies if this is rehashing old meatloaf. I'm new to
this list and am greatly interested in the future assignation of
IP space. I guess I should get a hobby:)
First off, I'm in agreement that IP space needs to be managed
carefully. I don't think anyone disputes this.
I believe that the proposed fees are WAAY too high, however.
Compared to RIPE, ARIN's rates are exorbitant. Consider:
(as of 1/17/97, the ECU=approx. $0.83)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RIPE NCC Billing Procedure and Fee Schedule
1. The 1997 fee schedule is as follows:
Enterprise registries: ECU 2200.- / year
Service Provider Registries:
Small ECU 2200.- / year
Medium ECU 3000.- / year
Large ECU 4000.- / year
Supernational Multiple times large registry
Please contact <billing at ripe.net>
Start-up fee for registries
established during 1997 ECU 1300.-
2. Registries established during the course of the year are charged as
follows:
+----------------------------------------------------+
|established during charge |
| |
|1st quarter start-up fee + full yearly fee |
|2nd quarter start-up fee + 3/4 yearly fee |
|3rd quarter start-up fee + 1/2 yearly fee |
|4th quarter start-up fee + 1/4 yearly fee |
+----------------------------------------------------+
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I see nothing on the ARIN page about partial years. Did I overlook it?
So, unless I'm misunderstanding, here's how I see the simplified
view for a small assignation:
STARTUP YEARLY
RIPE ECU1300(approx. $1040.00) ECU2200(approx. $1760.00)
ARIN $2500.00 $2500.00
This doesn't take into account the ASN fee, nor the membership
fee(does anyone know if RIPE has similar fees? I didn't have time
to look them up just now.).
I'm glad the ARIN proposal is just that, a proposal. I think
section 1.1 is begging for abuse down the road. It WILL lead to
cronyism, nepotism, and all the other isms associated with money
and power. IP addresses are going to be like phone numbers at some
point and to have 5 people electing each other and running the
organisation that takes in and manages the money made from IP
allocation is setting up future generations to be fleeced.
I don't see anything wrong with charging for IP numbers. I'd
just like to see it be a lot more reasonable. And I'd also
like to see the the BoT be somewhat more accountable to the
Internet community.
jamie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jamie at comet.net | Comet.Net | Send empty message
| Charlottesville, Va. | to pgpkey at comet.net
| (804)295-2407 | for pgp public key.
| http://www.comet.net |
"Remember, there are only two kinds of music ... Blues and
Zippidy-Do-Dah." -- Townes van Zandt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Naipr
mailing list