Why split IP allocations from the Internic?

[Jim Fleming]

On Wednesday, February 26, 1997 5:19 AM, Michael Dillon[SMTP:michael at MEMRA.COM] wrote:
@ On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Karl Denninger wrote:
@ 
@ > 1)	I have not seen anything in the bylaws or operational rules that
@ > 	state that the initial BOT (who are appointed) will be required to
@ > 	either stand for election or step down after a short (say, one year)
@ > 	period of time. 
@ > 
@ > 	I think this needs to be addressed.  If you want to stagger initial
@ > 	terms, that's fine, but then let's have the NSI folks off the BOT
@ > 	first -- after the first 12 months.
@ 
@ I agree with Karl. This does need to be addressed. It is understandable
@ that the BoT does not want to come out with a firm set of bylaws until
@ they have had a chance to carefully examine all sides of the issue but I
@ think the proposal on the website needs to be turned into more of a
@ working document with some incremental updates based upon public
@ commentary. It's not that hard to do and it would provide a useful point
@ of focus for the discussions on this list.

Has the ISP/C considered helping in this area?

It seems you folks just went through a lot of these issues
and are really getting things organized.
--
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation

e-mail:
JimFleming at unety.net
JimFleming at unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8)