Global council of registries???

[Jim Fleming]

On Monday, April 28, 1997 10:55 PM, David R. Conrad[SMTP:davidc at apnic.net] wrote:
@ Jimmy,
@ 
@ Let's try again:
@ 
@ >When you distribute any industry over a large number of people or
@ >companies, you allow everyone to have more choices. People will select
@ >based on people they know and trust.  They will also select based on
@ >existing business relationships with companies.
@ <blah blah blah>
@ 
@ That's all very nice and all that, however the question I asked was:
@ 
@ >@ Given your fantasy of a "registry industry" and 10s or 100s of
@ >@ registries, what do you think the chances are that a similar level of
@ >@ confidentiality can be maintained? (not that I expect an answer)
@ 
@ Care to answer a question someone asks?
@ 
@ Didn't think so.  At least you're consistent...
@ 

What do I think the chances are that a "similar"
level of confidentiality can be maintained...?

1. I do not think that confidentiality is maintained.

2. There is no need to discuss "levels" of confidentiality.

3. As for chances, I assume you imply luck is involved.

Given #1, #2, and #3 the answer is 0% chance.

My comment above was meant to indicate that I
think that there is a 100% chance chance that
standard business practices and standard business
confidentiality levels will be maintained IF standard
business evolution is allowed and not these socialistic,
one-party system, solutions, that place all of the power
in a few people's hands.

--
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation
http://www.Unir.Corp

Check out...http://www.Naperville.Mall