Petition for Discussion of ARIN-prop-160

[ARIN]

The message below started a petition regarding the ARIN Advisory
Council's decision to abandon ARIN-prop-160. The AC's decision was
posted by ARIN staff to PPML on 25 January 2012.

If successful, this petition will change ARIN-prop-160 into a Draft
Policy which will be published for adoption discussion on the PPML and
at the Public Policy Meeting in April 2012. If the petition fails, the
proposal will be closed.

For this petition to be successful, the petition needs statements of
support from at least 10 different people from 10 different
organizations. If you wish to support this petition, post a statement of
support to PPML on this thread.

The duration of the petition is until five business days after the AC's
draft meeting minutes are published. ARIN staff will post the result of
the petition to PPML.

For more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP
Petitions at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html

The proposal text is below and at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


#####


> Petition for 160 please.
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>> In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) held a meeting on 20 January 2012 and made decisions about several draft policies and proposals.
>>
>> The AC recommended the following draft policies to the ARIN Board for
>> adoption:
>>
>>  ARIN-2011-11: Clarify Justified Need for Transfers
>>  ARIN-2011-12: Set Transfer Need to 24 months
>>
>> The following proposal was added to the AC's docket for development and evaluation:
>>
>>  ARIN-prop-161 Normalize Free pool and Transfer justification periods
>>
>> The AC abandoned the following proposal:
>>
>>  ARIN-prop-160 Clarification of Section 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization
>>
>> Regarding proposal 160, the AC stated, "This proposal represented a significant change to the justification requirements in 4.2.3.4.1 for receiving PA space. The AC did not see significant support for such a change on PPML, and felt the proposal was not justified at this time."
>>
>> The AC thanks the authors and the community for their continuing effort
>> and contributions to these and all other policy considerations.
>>
>> The AC abandoned proposal 160. Anyone dissatisfied with this decision may initiate a petition. The petition to advance this proposal would be the "Discussion Petition." The deadline to begin a petition will be five business days after the AC's draft meeting minutes are published. For more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP Petitions at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html
>>
>> Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>>
>> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Communications and Member Services
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
>
> --
> Sent via a mobile device


ARIN-prop-160 Clarification of Section 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Proposal Originator: Martin Hannigan

Proposal Version: 1

Date: 22 DEC 2011

Proposal type: MODIFY

Policy term: PERMANENT

Policy statement:

Change policy statement from:

4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Reassignment information for prior allocations must show that each
customer meets the 80% utilization criteria and must be available via
SWIP / RWhois prior to your issuing them additional space.

To:

4.2.3.4.1. Utilization

Reassignment information for prior allocations made from the same
ISP's inventory must show that each customer meets the 80% utilization
criteria and must be available via SWIP / RWhois prior to your issuing
them additional number resources.

Rationale:

Existing policy is vague.

Timetable for implementation: Immediate