[Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight board (MONC)

[Jason Schiller]

After further investigation, seems I am missing part of where the SLAs
are...

There was a consultation process on performance standards that occurred
from Nov 20, 2012 through Feb 28, 2013.
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/iana-kpis-2012-11-20-en

The result of that consultation concluded that the IANA should provide a
monthly report on key performance indicators, as well as data about request
made and processed, and implementation of new global policy.
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-iana-kpis-22apr13-en.pdf

The archive of those reports can be found here:
https://www.iana.org/performance/metrics
You will want section c293 for the number resources part (append #c293 to
any of the URLs in the archive to jump straight there)

___Jason

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jason Schiller <jschiller at google.com>
wrote:

> I think there is a lot of confusion here first wrt to making the policy
> that the IANA operators follow and the oversight that the IANA operators
> follow said policy and meet the appropriate SLAs.
>
>  Secondly, I think there is much confusion wrt the term "ICANN".  Some
> times people use ICANN to me the small group of people employed by ICANN
> who perform the IANA operations, some times people mean the ICANN Board who
> ratifies Global Number Policy, sometimes people mean the entire ICANN
> community who discusses Domain Name concerns and such, and some time people
> mean a combination of some or all of those pieces.
>
> First let me say WRT Global Policy making, we have a very good process,
> per the ASO MoU
> <https://aso.icann.org/documents/memorandums-of-understanding/memorandum-of-understanding/>.
> This does not change with NTIA stepping away.
>
> What does change is the contract
> <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sf_26_pg_1-2-final_award_and_sacs.pdf>
> between the NTIA and ICANN for the IANA functions.  This document has some
> vague language about SLAs.  I understand the "real" SLAs are in this doc
> <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/2012/icann-proposal>.
>
> I already recommended (and David Huberman supported) step 1: we pull out
> those SLAs and put them in a document.  And asked ARIN staff to start on
> that work.  I'd like to ask the CRISP team, specifically Michael for a
> status on this work, and for that doc to be posted here once compiled.
>
> Step 2: We then need to decide what legal vehicle we should have, and who
> should it be between.  Should it be an MoU, a contract for services of the
> IANA function, or some other legal document?  And should it be between the
> five RIRs and the portion of ICANN that currently performs the IANA
> service?  Or the NRO, or the incorporated NRO? Should the document contain
> the SLAs or reference the SLA document?
>
> Step 3: We need to define a transparent process to review the monthly
> performance of the ICANN operator and its (in)ability to meet the SLAs and
> adhere to Global Policy.
>
> Step 4: We need a process for declaring the operator of the IANA service
> out of compliance.  We also need a process for actions taken due to
> non-compliance including threatening to remove the contract, and removing
> the contract.
>
> Step 5: We need a process for modifying the SLAs.
>
> Step 6: We need to ensure our processes include the appropriate community
> interaction for reviewing the operations of IANA function, and how those
> measurements are taken, declaration of (non-)compliance, and changes to SLA
> metrics.
>
> ___Jason
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:07 PM, David Huberman <
> David.Huberman at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As someone who very much wants to see the addressing function taken away
>> from ICANN and moved directly to the NRO, I'm not sure MONC is any more
>> useful than the NRO self-governing. The NRO is, after all, strictly
>> bottom-up.  RIR members elect board members. RIR board members select a
>> CEO.  The CEOs run the NRO.  There's accountability up and down the chain.
>>
>> My question is how do we leverage the NTIA's desire to step back to
>> dissolve the MOU between USGOV and ICANN wrt the clause, "Establishment of
>> policy for and direction of the allocation of IP number blocks;"
>>
>> David
>>
>> David R Huberman
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> Principal, Global IP Addressing
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/icann-mou-1998-11-25-en
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-transition mailing list
>> Iana-transition at arin.net
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________________
> Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
>
>


-- 
_______________________________________________________
Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141110/889698a0/attachment.html>