FW: Do rejected SWIPs look different?

[Einar Bohlin]

Good idea, we don't need to read the ones that go 
through, only the rejects.  I look for the word
'unable' in the current rejections.  But it
wouldn't hurt and might even help to add something to
the subject line.  How about appending "REJECTED" to the
end of the current subject line.

Later,

Einar Bohlin
IP Number Commissar 
UUNET Technologies, Inc.
Phone: USA 703 886-7362
email: ebohlin at uu.net
(VNET Number 806-7362)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 16:48:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: ginny listman <ginny at arin.net>
To: "Mazzella, John N" <John.Mazzella at qwest.com>
Cc: "'dbwg at arin.net'" <dbwg at arin.net>
Subject: Re: FW: Do rejected SWIPs look different?

I was hoping to see more discussion on this on the list. ARIN Engineering
can implement this. However, it is something that we would need community
consensus on. I imagine there are companies out there that would not like
us to change the header, or may need advanced notice of the change. Does
anyone else an opinion on this?

Ginny

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Mazzella, John N wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	IP Admin
> > Sent:	Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:19 PM
> > To:	'dbwg at arin.net'
> > Cc:	Mazzella, John N
> > Subject:	Do rejected SWIPs look different?
> >
> > ARIN,
> >
> > Is there a process in the works to change the appearance of rejected
> > SWIPs, so that we can parse rejected ARIN emails on our side?  If not,
> > then can I recommend that ARIN change the appearance (change the subject
> > line, insert "REJECTED SWIP" perhaps, etc.) so that we can search on the
> > string and better organize our email from ARIN?
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > John Mazzella
> > Qwest IP Admin
> > 703.363.4139
> >
> > PS: Also by the way, our ORG-DETAILEDs are visible and our swips appear to
> > be working smoothly!  Thank you to everyone involved in the database
> > conversion!
>


----- End forwarded message -----