From info at arin.net Thu Apr 10 16:47:36 2014 From: info at arin.net (ARIN) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:47:36 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-Suggestions] Response to Suggestion 2014.7: TERM LIMITS FOR ARIN ADVISORY COUNCIL Message-ID: <53470368.4090607@arin.net> ARIN has issued its initial response to ACSP Suggestion 2014.7. The suggestion and response text are provided below. This suggestion remains open and is available at: https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/suggestions/2014-7.html Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) **** Suggestion: * I propose the following be used for AC: Keep the 3 year terms in place and add a 6 year contiguous term limit a 3 year ineligibility year period after a term ends be it 3year or 6years After 3 year ineligibility is over a person my run for a position on the AC again. *Response:* Thank you for your suggestion, numbered 2014.7 upon receipt and confirmation. Your suggestion that ARIN institute a 6-year contiguous term limit followed by a 3-year ineligibility period for Advisory Council representatives has been forwarded to the ARIN Board of Trustees' Governance Committee as input to their deliberations regarding ARIN's governance. This suggestion will remain open until such time that we have conclusion from the committee. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at arin.net Wed Apr 23 10:29:13 2014 From: info at arin.net (ARIN) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:29:13 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-Suggestions] New ACSP Suggestion 2014.8: PUBLISH AN OPERATIONAL AND PROCEDURAL GUIDE Message-ID: <5357CE39.7020100@arin.net> A new suggestion was received through the ACSP, and was assigned number2014.8 upon receipt of confirmation. The text of the Suggestion is available at: https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/suggestions/2014-8.html ARIN will soon issue an initial response. Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) **** Suggestion: * Require ARIN to publish an Operational and Procedural Guide on ARIN.NET to how they conduct business. To many proposals are submitted that try to add and remove these items because no one has anywhere to reference them. Additionally, this would create transparency where their is not. For example, ARIN will ask some companies to provide Router output details while they don't others. This is an unfair business practice. The point being, transparency and knowing what standards are is important. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: