<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Hi Gerry,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Thanks to you and Doug Camin for shepherding the proposal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>The use of “most” is based solely on my experience; an average of 2-3 per year. I would say 80% of those would rather just stick with ARIN.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>I do find it strange that you must have a /22 in region to be able to use section 9, but that there is no upper limit. If you can demonstrate that you need a /16 or larger out of region, you can be approved for it. I personally do not like limiting it to equal or less than current in-region use; several of those buyers needed blocks in multiple out of region locations but only had a /23 or /24 in ARIN.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>The very fact that they have a /24 in ARIN means they have not only a connection with the ARIN region, but a real and substantial presence here. So far they have all been US companies with locations in other areas.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Gerry E.. George <ggeorge@digisolv.com> <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, March 18, 2026 1:10 PM<br><b>To:</b> Eddie Stauble <eddie@sum.net><br><b>Cc:</b> arin-ppml@arin.net<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Request for Comment & Feedback: Draft Policy ARIN-2025-3: Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Eddie,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Thank you for the detailed explanation and background on the factors that led to the initiation of this process and proposal.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>It also provides helpful clarification and some insight regarding Matthew’s point:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>"Most of these recipients would much rather keep everything together in one ARIN account instead of having to go to another registry." <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black'>Is the use of ‘most’ based on survey data or something else? To me, it seems important to determine whether or not there is a real quantified need. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>And also the point raised by Eric is worthy of further discussion:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#333333;background:#FAFAFA'>Should we rewrite the policy to allow any amount of out-of-region use so</span><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#333333'><br><span style='background:#FAFAFA'>long as it is less than or equal to in-region use? (Obviously the usual</span><br><span style='background:#FAFAFA'>needs-based rules also apply). </span></span><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#333333'><br><span style='background:#FAFAFA'>Using more addresses/prefixes in-region than out-of-region seems like</span><br><span style='background:#FAFAFA'>sufficient evidence of "real and substantial connection with the ARIN</span><br><span style='background:#FAFAFA'>region" and is far better than arbitrary length-based rules.</span></span><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Let's keep the discussion going. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy'>Gerry E. George</span></strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><br>ICT Consultant and Business Solutions Architect;<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Digi</span></strong><em><b><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Solv</span></b></em><strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>, Inc.</span></strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'> [P.O. Box 1677, Castries, Saint Lucia] <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;background:white'><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center></span></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Mobile</span></strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>: (758) 728-4858 /<strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> Int'l Office</span></strong>: (347) 450-3444<span style='background:white'> / Skype: DigiSolv</span><br><strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Email</span></strong>: <a href="mailto:ggeorge@digisolv.com">ggeorge@digisolv.com</a> / <strong><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>LinkedIn</span></strong>: <em><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerrygeorge/">https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerrygeorge/</a></span></em><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#797979;background:white'><br></span><b><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#557A34;background:white'>Please consider the environment before printing this email. Thank you.</span></i></b><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center id=zwchr></span></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>"Eddie Stauble via ARIN-PPML" <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>><br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, March 18, 2026 12:12:19 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [arin-ppml] Request for Comment & Feedback: Draft Policy ARIN-2025-3: Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><br>Sorry; I posted with the digest subject- first time poster!<br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Eddie Stauble <<a href="mailto:eddie@sum.net">eddie@sum.net</a>> <br>Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 11:31 AM<br>To: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>Subject: RE: ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 249, Issue 16<br><br>I am the individual who made this proposal last year. I am an IPv4 broker<br>and run into this issue on average 2-3 times a year.<br><br>The reason I proposed this change is that I see the rule as discriminatory<br>against the little guy; an injustice that I thought should be easy enough to<br>remedy.<br><br>The typical case is a buyer who has an ARIN account with at least a /24 but<br>less than a /22. He needs addresses out of region. He cannot justify to<br>ARIN since he does not have a /22 in region, so he has to go elsewhere.<br><br>He would prefer to keep everything in ARIN, and does not want to sign up<br>with RIPE or APNIC, though sometimes he does. His best option, and what I<br>typically advise him to do, is to get a legacy block, usually from ARIN,<br>though sometimes from APNIC, and register it in RIPE, which will incur no<br>extra fees or dues. The irony is that RIPE requires him to demonstrate need<br>when a block comes from ARIN.<br><br>It does not matter to me personally whether the proposal is accepted; I sell<br>an IPv4 block either way. I could also make the argument that I stand to<br>gain more by selling an ARIN legacy block to a buyer registering it as<br>legacy in RIPE as it is more complicated and takes more time.<br><br>Before making this proposal, I wanted to research why a /22 was settled on,<br>but could not find anything definitive.<br>From my research, it looks like out of region needs demonstration was first<br>proposed by Terri Stumme in PROP 189 in May 2013, and was abandoned.<br>The Second attempt was by David Farmer in PROP 192 in January 2014 and was<br>abandoned. <br>The third attempt was proposed by Christian Tacit in PROP 219 in May 2015.<br>It became draft policy ARIN-2015-5, implemented July 2016. The AC Shepherds<br>were Tina Morris and David Huberman.<br><br>In looking back over the discussions of the proposals, there was a concern<br>before ARIN ran out of addresses in September of 2015, that foreign entities<br>would set up shell companies in the ARIN region, looking for free addresses.<br>Now that ARIN is out, that fear is no longer valid.<br><br>There was a fear of the additional expenses and complexity involved in<br>verifying out of region use. Since the policy has been in effect for almost<br>10 years, ARIN should be able to weigh in with an opinion. It would be<br>interesting to know whether ARIN ever denies out of region needs<br>demonstration due to the lack of a /22 in region.<br><br>There were also concerns expressed about unlimited openness to out of region<br>use. Strangely, there is a lower limit on in-region use, but there is no<br>upper limit to how much space can be used out of region, as long as you have<br>a /22 in region. Has this been a problem?<br><br>At the time I made the proposal I was not aware that one could use out of<br>region use as needs demonstration to get a block from the waiting list. I<br>do think that language should be added to prevent that, though probably<br>complicating the issue. <br><br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: ARIN-PPML <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>> On Behalf Of<br><a href="mailto:arin-ppml-request@arin.net">arin-ppml-request@arin.net</a><br>Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 10:49 AM<br>To: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>Subject: ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 249, Issue 16<br><br>Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml-request@arin.net">arin-ppml-request@arin.net</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml-owner@arin.net">arin-ppml-owner@arin.net</a><br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than<br>"Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: Request for Comment & Feedback: Draft Policy ARIN-2025-3:<br> Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria (Matthew Cowen)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:49:09 +0000<br>From: Matthew Cowen <<a href="mailto:matthew@dgtlfutures.com">matthew@dgtlfutures.com</a>><br>To: ARIN PPML <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>><br>Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Request for Comment & Feedback: Draft Policy<br> ARIN-2025-3: Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria<br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:AEEC2D5C-FC18-4216-87E2-74994B8B461F@dgtlfutures.com">AEEC2D5C-FC18-4216-87E2-74994B8B461F@dgtlfutures.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Mike, thank you for your response. I definately understand there are real<br>costs involved, especially for small businesses, and potential losses to<br>ARIN, so thanks for your example. However, my question still stands: is this<br>a perceived problem or a real one that is quantified and supported by data<br>in the ARIN community based on the statement that ?most of these<br>recipients?? and actual use OOR? Doing policy for policy's sake seems like a<br>waste of time. I have no stake either way, i just think its important to<br>clarify that statement.<br><br>Apologies, if I implied anything nefarious from the operators. That wasn?t<br>my intention. I mentioned my local case as an illustration.<br><br>On 18 Mar 2026, at 10:20, Mike Burns <<a href="mailto:mike@sum.net">mike@sum.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>Hi Matthew,<br><br>That?s a reasonable question.<br><br>Considering the sizes at issue here, the costs of creating and maintaining<br>an account at a foreign registry can be a high fraction of the IPv4 purchase<br>cost, and so it would be unusual for any small ARIN account holder to prefer<br>the costs and burdens of multiple registry accounts.<br><br>The example examined the case of a small ARIN company requiring a /24 for<br>overseas use, and being forced to register that /24 at RIPE, whose initial<br>membership fee and ongoing fees for a /24 can quickly double the cost of<br>that /24 to that small ARIN company, to say nothing of the administrative<br>burdens or the loss of revenue to ARIN. This is an actual real example and<br>we were forced by the policy to address the user?s need in this expensive<br>manner. This policy would have avoided that.<br><br>It is actually not unusual for larger companies to have RIR accounts at<br>multiple registries and there is nothing nefarious about it.<br><br>Regards,<br>Mike<br><br><br>From: ARIN-PPML<br><<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net%3cmailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>>> On Behalf Of<br>Matthew Cowen via ARIN-PPML<br>Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 8:17 AM<br>To: ARIN PPML <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net%3cmailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net</a>>><br>Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Request for Comment & Feedback: Draft Policy<br>ARIN-2025-3: Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria<br><br>Quick question. The ?At issue? statement says:<br><br>"Most of these recipients would much rather keep everything together in one<br>ARIN account instead of having to go to another registry."<br><br>Is the use of ?most? based on survey data or something else? To me, it seems<br>important to determine whether or not there is a real quantified need.<br><br>I?d support the overall idea of the policy (although not as currently<br>proposed), but I think it should be unambiguous with respect to who and how<br>many are demanding this, and also potential for abuse, as highlighted. There<br>is a local case with Orange Cara?bes, the caribbean entity of Orange France,<br>with a mish-mash of resources from ARIN/RIPE! Possibly other FWI/France<br>operators too.<br><br>On 17 Mar 2026, at 04:54, Gerry E.. George<br><<a href="mailto:ggeorge@digisolv.com%3cmailto:ggeorge@digisolv.com">ggeorge@digisolv.com<mailto:ggeorge@digisolv.com</a>>> wrote:<br><br>Hello & Good day to PPML Community.<br><br>As assigned shepherds, Matthew Wilder & myself are seeking feedback &<br>comments on the current version of the Draft Policy ARIN-2025-3: Change<br>Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria.<br><br>I have summarized the key points below, but the full policy can be accessed<br>here:<br><a href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_3/">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_3/</a><br><br><br>ARIN-prop-341 (ARIN-2025-3) - Change Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum<br>Criteria<br><br>In brief:<br>Section 9 of the NRPM, Out of Region Use, requires organizations to use at<br>least a /22 in the ARIN region before they can justify out of region use.<br>This harms smaller organizations that have less than a /22 in region but do<br>require some out of region use.<br><br>Proposal:<br>Modify the following text in Section 9:<br><br> * FROM: IPv4: At least a /22 used in region.<br> * TO: IPv4: At least a /24 used in region.<br><br><br>RESULT:<br>Out of region use of ARIN registered resources are valid justification for<br>additional number resources, provided that the applicant has a real and<br>substantial connection with the ARIN region which applicant must prove (as<br>described below) and is using the same type of resources (with a delegation<br>lineage back to an ARIN allocation or assignment) within the ARIN service<br>region as follows:<br><br> * IPv4: At least a /24 used in region<br> * IPv6: At least a /44 used in region<br> * ASN: At least one ASN present on one or more peering sessions and/or<br>routers within the region<br><br><br>At issue:<br>When a company needs address space outside of the ARIN region without at<br>least a /22 in region, they go to RIPE and acquire either PI or Legacy space<br>(the least expensive option), often acquiring the space from ARIN sources.<br>In the case of an inter-regional ARIN to RIPE transfer, RIPE does require<br>the recipient to demonstrate need, as required by ARIN. ARIN is losing<br>registration of the block and annual fees, as well as the recipient transfer<br>fee. Most of these recipients would much rather keep everything together in<br>one ARIN account instead of having to go to another registry.<br><br>While there are no material legal issues, it is anticipated that this change<br>in policy would significantly increase the volume of IPv4 waitlist requests<br>and could lead to an increase to staff ticket workload.<br><br>Because the policy requirements for an organization to justify an initial<br>/24 are generally straightforward to meet, it is expected that more<br>organizations may request a /24 primarily to qualify for additional<br>ARIN-issued IPv4 addresses for out-of-region use. It is expected that this<br>would result in more ARIN IPv4 space being used out of region.<br><br>Concern regarding possible abuse of the reduced requirement in order to<br>obtain ARIN resources, particularly for blocks larger than the minimum (/24)<br>for OOR use.<br><br><br>Considerations:<br>- How much of an issue could this be? Does it matter to the community?<br>- Should there be a requirement for the OOR use be not more/greater than the<br>in-ARIN region use?<br>- Can this unfavorably impact companies having more growth OOR, and drive<br>them to other RIRs and away from ARIN in such instances?<br>- Is there a probability for potential abuse via the Waitlist, and if so,<br>should there be consideration for limitations to the designated region use<br>for 4.1.8. requests?<br>- Is the "real and substantial connection" requirement in Section 9 be<br>sufficient to prohibit or reduce the potential for abuse?<br><br><br>Questions:<br>Are you in support of the policy?<br><br>Are there any additional issues which should be considered?<br><br>Should the AC continue working on the policy as written?<br><br><br>And remember, the ARIN public policy process runs on positive consensus not<br>silent assent, so please weigh in. We look forward to your engagement.<br><br><br>Thanks.<br><br>Gerry E. George<br>ICT Consultant and Business Solutions Architect; DigiSolv, Inc. [P.O. Box<br>1677, Castries, Saint Lucia] ________________________________<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public<br>Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net%3cmailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net<mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>>).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br><a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net%3cmailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net<mailto:info@arin.net</a>> if you experience any<br>issues.<br><br><br>?<br>My best/Cordialement,<br><br>Matthew Cowen<br><br><br>?<br>My best/Cordialement,<br><br>Matthew Cowen<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL:<br><<a href="https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20260318/9594d3dc/at%0btachment-0002.htm">https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20260318/9594d3dc/at<br>tachment-0002.htm</a>><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Subject: Digest Footer<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 249, Issue 16<br>******************************************<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br><a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></body></html>