<html><body><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>I think the only change needed is how staff determine a sole proprietorship.<br>If the staff can get their head round how an individual can be a business entity without having to prove by a Secretary of State registration,<br>I think that solves the issue.<br>A State sales tax license, a redacted federal schedule C filed with a SS number.<br>The staff needs to adjust to how different states handle a business of one person instead of the inside the beltway thinking.<br>As long as the current wait list remains maybe something may need clarification going forward.<br><br>From what I have read it is a staff training issue and maybe a waiting list change for the future with current waiting list grandfathered as is.<br>John has said it is already a staff decision about how a person is determined to be to be a business.<br>It was impossible for me until I formed a one person LLC. But that was in 2010-2012 time period and John has said that<br>the staff determination is more liberal now. Correct John? <br>It caused me not to be able to get IPV4 in time before exhaustion.<br>I am now on the waiting list. We have been been marginally able to get by.<br><br>What am I not seeing?<br><br>Paul McNary<br><br><br><br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"Scott Leibrand" <scottleibrand@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Alison DAS WOOD" <Alison.WOOD@das.oregon.gov><br><b>Cc: </b>"arin-ppml" <arin-ppml@arin.net><br><b>Sent: </b>Monday, July 14, 2025 5:48:19 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [arin-ppml] Your feedback on Out of Region Waitlist ip space<br></div><div><br></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">IMO ARIN handles this well already and no policy updates are needed. They require an in-region nexus (and in-region usage on any needs justification), but don’t subsequently care what you do with the addresses unless you come back for more. <br><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Scott</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote>On Jul 14, 2025, at 11:03 AM, WOOD Alison * DAS <Alison.WOOD@das.oregon.gov> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote><div dir="ltr">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Hello Community!!</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
The Policy Experience Report Working Group (PERWG) would like to get the community’s input on a potential issue. Currently, IPv4 space allocated via the 4.1.8 waitlist must meet in-region justification at the time of request. However, the policy isn’t entirely
clear on what happens after the initial allocation — specifically, whether additional acquired 4.1.8 space could be used outside of the ARIN service region.</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
We’d like to hear your thoughts on the following question:</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Should all IPv4 space allocated from the 4.1.8 waitlist be explicitly restricted to use within the ARIN region, not just the initial allocation but on all subsequent allocations? </div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
We’re interested in whether such a restriction aligns with the original intent of 4.1.8 and how the community feels this should be handled going forward.</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'aptos' , 'aptos_embeddedfont' , 'aptos_msfontservice' , 'calibri' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Looking forward to your input!</div>
_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml<br>Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<br></div></blockquote></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml<br>Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<br></div></div></body></html>