<div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 15:02 Fernando Frediani <<a href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<p>Hello Martin</p></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Hi Fernando!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">[ clip ]</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><p dir="auto"></p>
<p dir="auto">IWith regards the IXP usage I reiterate my point when part of
these resources are used for IXP hosting stuff there will be a
major waste as on any IXP there will not be enough justification
for a entire /24 for this part which is the minimum routable. I
understand that is part of the IXP infrastructure, but at the end
it is known that will be a waste of most of that /24</p></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What is Internet resilience worth? Routing and utilization are separate questions.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">YMMV,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-M<</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><p dir="auto"></p>
<p></p></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"></div></div></div>