<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Dear ARIN-PPML,</p>
<p>Hope this email finds you in good health!</p>
<p>Please see my comment below, inline...</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 23/06/2023 à 18:03, August Yang via
ARIN-PPML a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d256d210-beeb-ce4d-442b-a49cfda34f30@august.tw">Current
hosted RPKI implementations across all RIRs follow a hierarchical
structure, where access to manage ROAs terminates at the party
directly allocated corresponding resources. IPv6 reverse DNS is
another example. If you've received a small IPv6 subnet through
reallocation, you may face similar restrictions in managing name
servers through ARIN Online, necessitating contact with the
LIR/ISP responsible.
<br>
<br>
To address the limitation, one solution is to implement a
delegated RPKI setup at LIR/ISP level. This allows the chain of
trust to be extended to end users, granting more control over the
specific IP resources reallocated. See
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.arin.net/resources/manage/rpki/delegated/">https://www.arin.net/resources/manage/rpki/delegated/</a>
<br>
<br>
It's worth noting that this issue primarily stems from technical
constraints of the hosted RPKI implementation, rather than being a
direct policy matter related to NRPM. There's an opportunity for
ARIN to consider adapting its hosted setup to align with the
allocation structure in whois database. This integration could
facilitate better RPKI adoption. <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Hi August,</p>
<p>Thanks for your clear explanation, brother!</p>
<p>...i think the right place to propose your fix is here [*].</p>
<p>__<br>
<font face="monospace">[*]: Consultations & Suggestions -
American Registry for Internet Numbers<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/"><https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/></a></font><br>
<br>
</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
<p>Shalom,</p>
<p>--sb.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d256d210-beeb-ce4d-442b-a49cfda34f30@august.tw"><br>
<br>
On 2023-06-23 12:20 p.m., Richard Laager wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">It is my understanding that the downstream
Org cannot create RPKI ROAs for Reallocated IP Networks. For
example, 206.9.80.0/24 is reallocated to me (OrgID WIKSTR-1),
but I cannot make a ROA for it.
<br>
<br>
This is obviously suboptimal for adopting RPKI.
<br>
<br>
Is this something that we could fix with Policy development, or
do I need to bark up some other tree?
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Richard
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">[...]
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-signature"><font face="monospace">-- <br>
Best Regards !<br>
</font>
<font face="monospace"><br>
baya.sylvain [AT cmNOG DOT cm]
<br>
|<a href="https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure">cmNOG's
Structure</a>|<a href="https://survey2.cmnog.cm/">cmNOG's
Surveys</a>|<a
href="https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog">Subscribe
to cmNOG's Mailing List</a>|
<br>
__
<br>
#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«*Que LE #DIEU de #Paix
soit avec vous tous! #Amen!*»
#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau.#Chrétiennement
<br>
«*Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon
âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!*» (#Psaumes42:2)</font></div>
</body>
</html>