<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Speaking for myself, I oppose this draft policy. In my opinion even though there is no legal binding to this attestation, there is a substantial organization awareness level that having an officer attestation brings to those beyond the IT or technical teams. This type of awareness helped me in efforts to bring our legacy resources under an RSA agreement. </div><br class=""><div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div>Brian Jones</div><div><a href="mailto:bjones@vt.edu" class="">bjones@vt.edu</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 24, 2022, at 3:50 PM, Matthew Wilder <<a href="mailto:Matthew.Wilder@telus.com" class="">Matthew.Wilder@telus.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">Hi PPML,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Staff and Legal review has been conducted for Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3. The relevant bit for the community to consider is the legal review, which is as follows:</div><div class="">"No material legal issue. Removal of the officer attestation would not materially impact ARIN’s ability to pursue cases of fraud."</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As shepherds, we believe this directly resolves the primary concern voiced by members of the community.<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">For the full staff and legal review, please check the following:</div><div class=""><a href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_3/#staff-and-legal-review-15-august-2022" class="">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_3/#staff-and-legal-review-15-august-2022</a><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards,</div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><b class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(118,113,113)" class="">Matthew Wilder</span></b><br class=""></p></div></div></div><br class=""></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:24 PM Matthew Wilder <<a href="mailto:matthew.wilder@telus.com" class="">matthew.wilder@telus.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">Hi PPML,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for summarizing the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer attestation requirement for documentation of needs assessment.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to be that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and legal review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Warm regards,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><b class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(118,113,113)" class="">Matthew Wilder</span></b></p></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">ARIN-PPML<br class="">You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br class="">the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" class="">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br class="">Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br class=""><a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" class="">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br class="">Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>