<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I don't understand your way to oppose this proposal. You want to
oppose it based a small subset of 'situation in other regions'
text ? That your only point to oppose this proposal ?<br>
The text clearly says the leasing of addresses is not authorized
explicitly in the policy manuals and in most RIRs it has been
already confirmed this is not allowed in most RIRs (exactly as it
should be). In RIPE that you are picking in order to try oppose
this proposal it mentions specifically that this cannot be used as
a justification of need and it is obvious you cannot go to RIPE,
ask for addresses and justify that you will use them to lease to
someone else, pretending to be a sub-RIR. It is just simple.</p>
<p>In ARIN this proposal will make it very clear not only for
justification of need which is already forbidden but also later on
for usage and that is the right thing to do in order to avoid more
unfairness with the whole community in times of IPv4 exhaustion.<br>
What is the logic for not being able to justify the need based on
leasing but be allowed to used for them for leasing later on ?<br>
</p>
<p>The point here is quiet simple and most people are able to
understand: if you have a need to keep IP resources as a resource
holder for justified need proposes you are fine to keep the
addresses indefinitely, if not your should either transfer them to
whoever has real need or return them back to ARIN so them can be
directly assigned by ARIN to any member who really needs them and
have no intermediaries in the middle pretending to be a RIR and
bringing real security issues to the whole Internet.</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/09/2022 14:01, Mike Burns wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:18328593241.10f5931df331158.7951445432366913301@iptrading.com">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 10pt;">
<div>Fernando,<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Your proposal says leasing is banned at other RIRs.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am telling you once again that leasing is NOT banned at
RIPE and leased addresses CAN be used as justification at
RIPE. <br>
</div>
<div>I speak from direct experience.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And once again there is no policy nor contract requirement
to utilize addresses at ARIN for their originally intended
purposes, ergo leasing is not prohibited to address holders at
ARIN.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please define the word leasing as that impacts enforcement
and other issues.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This proposal remains deeply flawed.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So I remain deeply opposed.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,<br>
</div>
<div>Mike<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="zmail_extra_hr" style="border-top: 1px solid
rgb(204, 204, 204); height: 0px; margin-top: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 0px;"><br>
</div>
<div class="zmail_extra" data-zbluepencil-ignore="true">
<div><br>
</div>
<div id="Zm-_Id_-Sgn1">---- On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:44:10 -0400
<b>Fernando Frediani <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com"><fhfrediani@gmail.com></a></b> wrote
---<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin: 0px;">
<div
class="zm_4893356557961471583_parse_-4899516397381554474">
<p>Hello<br>
</p>
<p>There is no such error in the proposal.<br>
This has been checked as being the interpretation staff
gives to the current policy in most RIRs. APNIC is just
an example that have confirmed it publicly a couples of
days ago. <br>
You may not find all the very specific words you may
wish for in the text, but it is not much difficult for
them to have such interpretation given the resources
must follow a proper justification of what they will be
used for and that can never be that you will use them
for leasing (rent of lend). ARIN also already confirmed
in this very same list they don't accept it as a
justification.<br>
</p>
<p>There is no much around the term leasing. If an
organization who don't provide any connectivity services
to another simply rent or lend IP space, with or without
a cost associated that is something that must not be
since they no longer have a justification to keep that
IP space and instead should either transfer it to those
who really justify or return to ARIN.<br>
</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<div class="x_-241352059moz-cite-prefix">On 24/08/2022
11:04, Mike Burns wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<style>div.zm_4893356557961471583_parse_-4899516397381554474 a:link,
div.zm_4893356557961471583_parse_-4899516397381554474 span.x_-241352059MsoHyperlink {
color: rgb(5, 99, 193);
text-decoration: underline;
}</style>
<div class="x_-241352059WordSection1" style="page:
WordSection1;">
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Opposed, I
think the proposal contains errors that should
be fixed before the discussion proceeds.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">For example
this statement :</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">“<span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">In other
RIRs, the leasing of addresses is not
authorized either and since it is not
explicit in their policy manuals either,
this proposal will be presented as well.”</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"> </span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">If it is
not in their policy manuals, how can the
proposers state leasing is not authorized?</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">Where do
the proposers think authority comes from, if
not from policy and contract?</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">Are they
just assuming that all things are prohibited
unless they are explicitly allowed?</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">That would
be an interesting way to read the policy
manual, if that is the belief, we should
discuss that.</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"> </span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">Beyond
that there is the very next sentence:</span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">” Nothing
is currently mentioned in RIPE about this
and it is not acceptable as a justification
of the need. “ </span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><span
class="highlight" style="background-color:
white;"><span class="colour"
style="background-image: initial;
background-position: initial;
background-size: initial; background-repeat:
initial; background-attachment: initial;
background-origin: initial; background-clip:
initial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"> </span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Once again
the bias is towards prohibition despite language
about leasing being absent from RIPE policy.
More to the point, and something that can’t be
drummed-home clearly enough to this community,
RIPE has no needs test at all for transfers and
hasn’t for years. And yet RIPE still exists and
operates as an RIR. Even further to the point,
in the one occasion that RIPE performs a
needs-test, which is on inter-regional transfers
from ARIN, leased-out addresses are in fact
acceptable as justification. That’s because of
two logical things. First, RIPE understands that
the inherent value of the addresses drives them
towards efficient use. Second, RIPE understands
that they are charged with getting addresses
into use, not getting them into use on
particular networks.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">So the first
two sentences in the “situation at other RIRs”
are problematic/false.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Might I
suggest fixing those before we move forward, and
also can you please define the word leasing?</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">This seems
poorly though-out to me, and I haven’t started
on the meat of the proposal yet nor how it would
be effectively policed and prohibited.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Regards,<br>
Mike</span></span></p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<div>
<div style="border: none;border-top: solid
rgb(225,225,225) 1.0pt;padding: 3.0pt 0.0in 0.0in
0.0in;">
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b>
ARIN-PPML <a
class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net></a>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>ARIN<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 23, 2022 12:29
PM<br>
<b>To:</b> PPML <a
class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><arin-ppml@arin.net></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [arin-ppml] Draft Policy
ARIN-2022-9: Leasing Not Intended</span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">On 18 August
2022, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
"ARIN-prop-308: Leasing Not Intended" as a Draft
Policy.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Draft Policy
ARIN-2022-9 is below and can be found at:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><a
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_9/"
class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext
moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_9/</a></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">You are
encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on
PPML. The AC will evaluate the discussion to
assess the conformance of this draft policy with
ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource
policy as stated in the Policy Development
Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles
are:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">* Enabling
Fair and Impartial Number Resource
Administration</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">*
Technically Sound</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">* Supported
by the Community</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">The PDP can
be found at:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"><a
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/"
class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext
moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/</a></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Draft
Policies and Proposals under discussion can be
found at: <a
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/"
class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext
moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/</a></span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Regards,</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Sean Hopkins</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Senior
Policy Analyst</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">American
Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Draft Policy
ARIN-2022-9: Leasing Not Intended</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Problem
Statement:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">“IPv6 Policy
(section 6.4.1.) explicitly mention that address
space is not a property. This is also stated in
the RSA (section 7.) for all the Internet Number
Resources.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">However,
with the spirit of the IPv4 allocation policies
being the same, there is not an equivalent text
for IPv4, neither for ASNs.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Further to
that, policies for IPv4 and IPv6 allocations,
clearly state that allocations are based on
justified need and not solely on a predicted
customer base. Similar text can be found in the
section related to Transfers (8.1).</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Consequently,
resources not only aren’t a property, but also,
aren’t allocated for leasing purposes, only for
justified need of the resource holder and its
directly connected customers.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Therefore,
and so that there are no doubts about it, it
should be made explicit in the NRPM that the
Internet Resources should not be leased “per
se”, but only as part of a direct connectivity
service. At the same time, section 6.4.1. should
be moved to the top of the NRPM (possibly to
section 1. “Principles and Goals of the American
Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)”.”</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Policy
statement:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Actual Text
(to be replaced by New Text):</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">6.4.1.
Address Space Not to be Considered Property</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">It is
contrary to the goals of this document and is
not in the interests of the Internet community
as a whole for address space to be considered
freehold property.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">The policies
in this document are based upon the
understanding that globally-unique IPv6 unicast
address space is allocated/assigned for use
rather than owned.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">New Text</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">1.5.
Internet Number Resources Not to be Considered
Property</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">It is
contrary to the goals of this document and is
not in the interests of the Internet community
as a whole for address space to be considered
freehold property.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">The policies
in this document are based upon the
understanding that Internet Number Resources are
allocated/assigned for use rather than owned.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">ARIN
allocate and assign Internet resources in a
delegation scheme, with an annual validity,
renewable as long as the requirements specified
by the policies in force at the time of renewal
are met, and especially the justification of the
need.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Therefore,
the resources can’t be considered property.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">The
justification of the need, generically in the
case of addresses, implies their need to
directly connect customers. Therefore, the
leasing of addresses is not considered
acceptable, nor does it justify the need, if
they are not part of a set of services based, at
least, on direct connectivity.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Even in
cases of networks not connected to the Internet,
the leasing of addresses is not admissible,
since said sites can request direct assignments
from ARIN and even in the case of IPv4, use
private addresses or arrange transfers.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Timetable
for implementation: Immediate</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Situation in
other Regions:</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">In other
RIRs, the leasing of addresses is not authorized
either and since it is not explicit in their
policy manuals either, this proposal will be
presented as well.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Nothing is
currently mentioned in RIPE about this and it is
not acceptable as a justification of the need.
In AFRINIC, APNIC and LACNIC, the staff has
confirmed that address leasing is not considered
as valid for the justification.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p class="" style=""><span class="font"
style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif"><span
class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span></span><br>
</p>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<pre class="x_-241352059moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-abbreviated x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<a class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a>
Please contact <a class="x_-241352059moz-txt-link-abbreviated x_-241352059moz-txt-link-freetext moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>_______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div>ARIN-PPML <br>
</div>
<div>You are receiving this message because you are
subscribed to <br>
</div>
<div>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
(<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>). <br>
</div>
<div>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription
at: <br>
</div>
<div><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a> <br>
</div>
<div>Please contact <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any
issues. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>