<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div><br></div><div>"On the other hand, all rejected <br></div><div>nominees should be entitled to know the reasons privately, and simply asking for <br></div><div>them does not imply such waiver."<br></div><div><br></div><div>Hi John,<br></div><div><br></div><div>I was rejected, never got a reason, whom do I simply ask?<br></div><div>(Just letting everybody know that it doesn't work that way currently.)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>Mike</div><div><br></div><div class="zmail_extra_hr" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); height: 0px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 0px;"><br></div><div class="zmail_extra" data-zbluepencil-ignore="true"><div><br></div><div id="Zm-_Id_-Sgn1">---- On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:18:38 -0400 <b>John Santos <john@egh.com></b> wrote ----<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin: 0px;"><div><br><br>On 10/28/2021 4:47 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:<br>> First, I invite ARIN staff or Trustees to please advise if discussion of active ASCP Suggestions is appropriate on PPML, and if not, please suggest an alternative forum for doing so. Would arin-consult@ be a more appropriate place for this discussion?<br>> <br>> Reading both of these suggestions, I agree with the goals of both of these. That said, I would suspect that the language in 2021.22 calling for the publication of the NomCom’s explanation for rejecting a petitioning nominee may prove problematic from a privacy point of view. At the very least, it should be required that a declined nominee must be made explicitly aware of, and consent to, this disclosure as a part of the process of opening a petition.<br>> <br>> -C<br>> <br><br>I assumed all along that privacy of the nominee was the reason why the <br>explanation is not revealed, and the NomCom should reveal the explanation only <br>if the nominee explicitly waives privacy. On the other hand, all rejected <br>nominees should be entitled to know the reasons privately, and simply asking for <br>them does not imply such waiver.<br><br>-- <br>John Santos<br>Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.<br>781-861-0670 ext 539<br>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br><a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div></div><br></body></html>