<div dir="auto">Ah, of course! My apologies. The answer to that is: 26 organizations would be reinstated if this policy went through. </div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:32 AM <<a href="mailto:scott@solarnetone.org">scott@solarnetone.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">Hi Alyssa,<br>
<br>
Good to speak with you. Perhaps I mispoke... how many organizations were <br>
removed from the waitlist and are still seeking larger allocations? If <br>
my understanding of the original issue appears unclear, please enlighten <br>
me!<br>
<br>
I am trying to determine if orgs other than the petitioner were <br>
effected; if so, how many, and what effect that would have on ARIN's <br>
related inventory of addresses allocatable via the waitlist (not including <br>
4.10s, etc.).<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Scott<br>
<br>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Alyssa Moore wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi Scott,<br>
> <br>
> Anita Nikolich (AC member) answered this on Dec 16:<br>
> <br>
> >Please note (and you can refer to the Nov AC minutes) that organizations<br>
> that are currently on the waitlist won’t be affected, because the next<br>
> disbursement of v4 would fulfill all the exempted orgs as well as the ones<br>
> remaining on the list. The overall impact to the current waitlist is<br>
> non-existent from these requests. <br>
> <br>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:21 AM <<a href="mailto:scott@solarnetone.org" target="_blank">scott@solarnetone.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi John,<br>
><br>
> In these deliberations, I think it would be useful to know how<br>
> many actual<br>
> ARIN Member Organizations would be effected. I am not talking<br>
> about<br>
> downstream customers, affiliates, or the like, but only resource<br>
> holders<br>
> on the actual waitlist. Does John Sweeting have any metrics as<br>
> to this?<br>
> Further, if all effected organizations were to receive the<br>
> allocations<br>
> they are seeking, what percentage of the available address<br>
> inventory would<br>
> be immediately exhausted?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Scott<br>
><br>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, John Curran wrote:<br>
><br>
> > On 14 Jan 2021, at 11:00 AM, Michael B. Williams<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:Michael.Williams@glexia.com" target="_blank">Michael.Williams@glexia.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > How does ARIN analyze the response from this? Is there<br>
> weight<br>
> > given only to ARIN member organizations or any<br>
> organization? If<br>
> > anyone is given consideration, what is to stop people<br>
> from<br>
> > lobbying individuals and other organizations to send an<br>
> email to<br>
> > support their agenda? For example, I could very easily<br>
> find 500<br>
> > people to respond to this email saying they do not<br>
> support the<br>
> > policy. If I were a malicious actor trying to influence<br>
> policy<br>
> > discussion and were to offer some sort of incentive for<br>
> those to<br>
> > reply I could easily have thousands of organizations<br>
> supporting<br>
> > this policy one way or another. <br>
> ><br>
> > My feelings would be the majority of the weight should be<br>
> given to<br>
> > ARIN member organizations voices as part of the tallying<br>
> process. If<br>
> > that is the case, perhaps we should ask those organizations to<br>
> include<br>
> > their ARIN org id?<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Michael - <br>
> ><br>
> > The ARIN Policy Development Process specifies the petition<br>
> appeal process,<br>
> > and the sole criteria for a successful petition is expressions<br>
> of support<br>
> > from at least 25 different people from 25 different<br>
> organizations. <br>
> ><br>
> > Note that a successful petition simply means that the policy –<br>
> without any<br>
> > recommendation of adoption from the ARIN Advisory Council –<br>
> will be sent to<br>
> > the ARIN Board of Trustees for their consideration of possible<br>
> adoption.<br>
> > Also note that for the purpose of determining petition<br>
> success, ARIN staff<br>
> > will only be counting those messages which clearly indicate<br>
> support for the<br>
> > petition and include both the submitters name and their<br>
> organization. <br>
> ><br>
> > The ARIN Board is on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, and<br>
> will see any<br>
> > discussion of substantial merits or concerns with the policy. <br>
> Each trustee<br>
> > is free to weight such input as they see fit, but at this<br>
> point it is not a<br>
> > numerical question – as we are not seeking a poll of support<br>
> or opposition<br>
> > to the policy – but rather simply whether at least 25<br>
> organizations feel<br>
> > (despite the ARIN AC’s decision not to recommend) that policy<br>
> warrants<br>
> > consideration by the ARIN Board of Trustees. <br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > /John<br>
> ><br>
> > John Curran<br>
> > President and CEO<br>
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> >_______________________________________________<br>
> ARIN-PPML<br>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
> <a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
> Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
></blockquote></div></div>