<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I do not support the reintroduction of organizations onto the
      wait-list who were removed due to having existing address holdings
      larger than a /20.  Being on the wait-list was never a guarantee
      that you would receive space.  The AC had to balance the various
      elements of block size and organizations who would be eligible to
      receive space under the updated policy and we were aware that the
      rules as implemented would prevent some organizations on the
      wait-list from receiving blocks going forward.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>Speaking only for myself, not the AC</p>
    <p>Andrew<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/19/2020 11:25 AM, Alyssa Moore
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CANBZQC54wqr=0aD7BpvmrrtH8eBbQsTYd5xKdfHudiJg6piRrw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi folks, <br>
        <br>
        There was some great discussion of this policy proposal at
        ARIN45. We hear a wide range of views including:<br>
        <ol>
          <li>Don't grandfather organizations. The new waitlist policy
            is sound. </li>
          <li>Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16
            should be eligible for their original request size (even if
            it exceeds the new limit of a /22). </li>
          <li>Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16
            should remain eligible if their holdings exceed a /20 OR a
            /18. The draft policy under discussion specifies a /18 total
            holdings for grandfathered orgs, while the current waitlist
            policy (2019-16) specifies a /20.</li>
          <li>Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16
            should be eligible regardless of their total holdings
            because that was not a restriction of the policy under which
            they originally qualified for the waitlist. <br>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <div> There was general support to continue finessing this
          draft. If you have views on the above noted parameters, please
          make them known here.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>For reference: <br>
          <br>
          <b>Old waitlist policy</b></div>
        <div>
          <ol>
            <li>Requester specifies smallest block they'd be willing to
              accept, equal to or larger than the applicable minimum
              size specified elsewhere in ARIN policy.<br>
            </li>
            <li>Did not place a limit on the total existing IP address
              holdings of a party eligible for the waitlist.<br>
            </li>
            <li>Made resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for
              transfer until after a period of 12 months. </li>
          </ol>
          <b>New Waitlist Policy</b><br>
          <ol>
            <li>Limits the size of block ARIN can issue on the waitlist
              to a /22.<br>
            </li>
            <li>Places a limit on the total existing IP address holdings
              of a party eligible for the waitlist at a /20 or less.<br>
            </li>
            <li>Makes resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for
              transfer until after a period of 60 months.  <br>
            </li>
          </ol>
          <div><br>
            Best, <br>
            Alyssa</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:35
          PM David Farmer <<a href="mailto:farmer@umn.edu"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">farmer@umn.edu</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">I support this policy and believe the policy
              development process is the proper place to handle this
              issue. However, this policy seems to be implementable as a
              one-time policy directive to ARIN Staff. Once implemented,
              by putting the effected organizations back on the waiting
              list, it seems unnecessary to memorialized the text in the
              NRPM, it would immediately become extraneous and
              potentially confusing to future readers of the NRPM.
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Therefore, I would like to recommend the Policy
                Statement not be added to the NRPM upon its
                implementation. I believe this to be consistent with the
                intent of the policy.  Otherwise, does ARIN Staff have
                procedural advice on how best to handle what seems like
                a one-time directive?</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Thanks</div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at
                12:21 PM ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a>>
                wrote:</div>
              <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
                <br>
                Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of
                Organizations Removed from <br>
                Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16<br>
                <br>
                Problem Statement:<br>
                <br>
                The implementation of the ARIN-2019-16 Advisory Council
                Recommendation <br>
                Regarding NRPM 4.1.8: Unmet Requests caused some
                organizations to be <br>
                removed from the waiting list that were approved under
                the old policy’s <br>
                eligibility criteria. These organizations should have
                been grandfathered <br>
                when the waitlist was reopened to allow them to receive
                an allocation of <br>
                IPv4 up to the new policy’s maximum size constraint of a
                /22.<br>
                <br>
                Policy Statement: Update NRPM Section 4.1.8 as follows:<br>
                <br>
                Add section 4.1.8.3 (temporary language in the NRPM to
                remain until the <br>
                policy objective is achieved)<br>
                <br>
                Restoring organizations to the waitlist<br>
                <br>
                ARIN will restore organizations that were removed from
                the waitlist at <br>
                the adoption of ARIN-2019-16 to their previous position
                if their total <br>
                holdings of IPv4 address space amounts to a /18 or less.
                The maximum <br>
                size aggregate that a reinstated organization may
                qualify for is a /22.<br>
                <br>
                All restored organizations extend their 2 year approval
                by [number of <br>
                months between July 2019 and implementation of new
                policy]. Any requests <br>
                met through a transfer will be considered fulfilled and
                removed from the <br>
                waiting list.<br>
                <br>
                Comments:<br>
                <br>
                Timetable for implementation: Immediate<br>
                <br>
                Anything Else: While attending ARIN 44 and discussing
                this with other <br>
                community members the vast majority indicated that they
                agreed that some <br>
                organizations were treated unfairly. This proposal is a
                remedy.<br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                ARIN-PPML<br>
                You are receiving this message because you are
                subscribed to<br>
                the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a
                  href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
                Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
                <a rel="noreferrer"
                  href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
                Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a>
                if you experience any issues.<br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br clear="all">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            -- <br>
            <div dir="ltr">===============================================<br>
              David Farmer               <a
                href="mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">Email:farmer@umn.edu</a><br>
              Networking & Telecommunication Services<br>
              Office of Information Technology<br>
              University of Minnesota   <br>
              2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815<br>
              Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952<br>
              =============================================== </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          ARIN-PPML<br>
          You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
          the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a
            href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
          Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
          <a href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
          Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a> if you experience
          any issues.<br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a>
Please contact <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>