<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>I may be wrong but it looks like that for some people at some
point the only thing that matters is the sensation someone may be
trying to tell them how to do things than if IPv6 should be
deployed or not.<br>
Right, how long more will we be in this back and forth of "I know
I have to deploy IPv6 but I will do on my own time" ? How long
more we will hear things like "there is no other way out of
transfer market" and "it is natural thing to buy more IPv4 to be
in business" and then right after "Don't tell me I have to deploy
IPv6".</p>
<p>There have been times in the past when deploying IPv6 had
challenges, concerns or limitations, but now a days let's be
honest, there are probably none. We are in 2019, nearly 2020 and
it seems there are still a significant amount of people that
wishes to keep supporting the transfer market rather than do the
obvious that we all know will make the Internet ecosystem to keep
evolving, perhaps with less conflicts.<br>
And what Albert is proposing to discuss is fair and very much
reasonable, nothing out of order: simply the organization to show
it is doing its job (or is there anyone the believes IPv6 is still
just accessory and can wait another 20 years ?) in order that is
can use the transfer mechanism of IPv4. He didn't suggest anything
different than that.<br>
</p>
<p>Shall we focus on discussing the pro and cons of this possible
proposal, if it is suitable or not, if it will make the Internet
advance or not, rather than arm against the nature of things ?<br>
Thanks for bringing this 2007 Board's statement to this
discussion.<br>
</p>
<p>Regards<br>
Fernando<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/08/2019 23:44,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:hostmaster@uneedus.com">hostmaster@uneedus.com</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:alpine.LRH.2.21.1908272241160.26250@bigone.uneedus.com">I
noticed this item from 7 May 2007 that I think would support my
suggestion:
<br>
<br>
WHEREAS, community access to Internet Protocol (IP) numbering
Resources has proved essential to the successful growth of the
Internet; and,
<br>
<br>
WHEREAS, ongoing community access to Internet Protocol version
4 (IPv4) numbering resources can not be assured indefinitely; and,
<br>
<br>
WHEREAS, Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) numbering
resources are available and suitable for many Internet
applications,
<br>
<br>
BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of Trustees hereby advises the
Internet community that migration to IPv6 numbering resources is
necessary for any applications which require ongoing availability
from ARIN of contiguous IP numbering resources; and,
<br>
<br>
BE IT ORDERED, that this Board of Trustees hereby directs ARIN
staff to take any and all measures necessary to assure veracity of
applications to ARIN for IPv4 numbering resources; and,
<br>
<br>
BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of Trustees hereby requests
the ARIN Advisory Council to consider Internet Numbering Resource
Policy changes advisable to encourage migration to IPv6 numbering
resources where possible.
<br>
<br>
Unanimously passed by the Board of Trustees on 7 May 2007.
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, John Curran wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 27 Aug 2019, at 5:26 PM, David Farmer
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:farmer@umn.edu"><farmer@umn.edu></a> wrote:
<br>
...
<br>
The US Government tried to force it's departments to do
IPv6
<br>
most of them did it, but many promptly turned it off after
<br>
passing the tests.
<br>
<br>
<br>
David -
<br>
While not taking any position on the proposed policy change, I
would like to
<br>
make sure the record is correct with regard to USG IPv6
deployment…
<br>
<br>
To this day, US government agencies have a high IPv6 adoption
rate for their
<br>
public facing services (particularly when compared to the
industry or
<br>
educational deployment rate in the US.)
<br>
Note that you can readily show this, as NIST measures deployment
daily and
<br>
publishes the results here
- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov">https://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov</a>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,
<br>
/John
<br>
<br>
John Curran
<br>
President and CEO
<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a>
Please contact <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>