<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>I don't think it should be regardless of the size. That must
always be a limit.<br>
</p>
<p>If it's over, it's over and anything little left should favor
newcomers to make sure they can properly exist in the Internet and
do business in Dual-Stack. Leaving to any prefix size just make it
more difficult for new businesses which always help to balance the
whole ecosystem. Having a limit is the most reasonable thing
always in a scenario like this.</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/05/2019 12:11, Steven Ryerse via
ARIN-PPML wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:b6afded15c2544f1af60e23867b915ab@eclipse-networks.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Gothic";
panose-1:2 11 6 9 7 2 5 8 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Gothic";
panose-1:2 11 6 9 7 2 5 8 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Real life may be that larger sizes never
come available, but if the size does come available and an org
is next on the list and it can be justified within ARIN’s
normal policies, then it should be assigned regardless of
size. +1 to this comment.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Steven Ryerse<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">President<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">100 Ashford Center
North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">770.656.1460 - Cell<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">770.399.9099 - Office<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">770.392.0076 - Fax<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"MS
Mincho",serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><img
style="width:.5833in;height:.3854in" id="_x0000_i1027"
src="cid:part1.BF6D5507.B8FDFD40@gmail.com"
alt="Description: Description: Eclipse Networks
Logo_small.png" class="" width="56" height="37"></span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"MS
Gothic";color:#1F497D">℠</span><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">
</span><span style="font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Eclipse Networks, Inc.</span><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"><sup><span
style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> Conquering
Complex Networks</span></sup><sup><span
style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#1F497D">℠</span></sup><sup><span
style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet
MS",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></sup></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> ARIN-PPML
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net"><arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net></a> <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Tom Pruitt<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 13, 2019 10:39 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> David Farmer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:farmer@umn.edu"><farmer@umn.edu></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council
Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My biggest objection is limiting of an
organization to a specific size. Although I realize ARIN
can change policies, I believe if an organization has in good
faith followed the existing rules and been put on the waiting
list that they should not come away with nothing especially
those that were on the list before the current suspension
began. If those organizations were watching the list, and
moving up, it is likely that they have made business decisions
based on that data with the assumption that they would get an
allocation at some point. I believe the proposed allocation
limit is being discussed as a method to discourage bad actors
from receiving address space and then just holding them in
order to sell them at a profit once they are allowed, but as
you stated “the waiting list is primarily a mechanism to
ensure resources are not stuck at ARIN”, that has nothing to
do with the size of an organization requesting resources.
I can support an allocation limit per allocation, and even
extending the time an organization must wait before getting
back on the wait list. That being said, if an organization is
willing to wait on the list until the resources are available
then they should get the allocation.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks<span style="color:#002060">,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tom Pruitt <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Network Engineer<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Stratus Networks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="width:2.0208in;height:.6875in"
id="Picture_x0020_1"
src="cid:part2.05435669.25911E44@gmail.com"
alt="stratus_networks_logo_FINAL" class="" width="194"
height="66"><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> David Farmer <<a
href="mailto:farmer@umn.edu" moz-do-not-send="true">farmer@umn.edu</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 10, 2019 3:44 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tom Pruitt <<a
href="mailto:tpruitt@stratusnet.com" moz-do-not-send="true">tpruitt@stratusnet.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council
Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If /20 is too small is their another
size you would propose? a /19 or a /18 maybe? Do you
have an argument for why that is the right number?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">When the AC looked at this there was
strong support for limiting the size of the organization
that could qualify to ensure these resources went to
smaller organizations. But there were varying opinions
on what that size should be, /20 was just the option
with the most support amongst the AC. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This formulation also provides a
limit on how many times an organization can go back to
the waiting list, allowing smaller organizations more
times to return to the waiting list, while limiting
lager organization to fewer times to return to the
waiting list. And organizations that already have
more than a /20 must go to the market.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">A /20 limit, gives a new
organization (with no resources) the opportunity
receive up to 5 allocations from the waiting list if
they got a /22 each time.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">A /19 limit would allow a new ISP
up to 9 allocations if they got a /22 each time.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">A /18 limit would allow a new ISP
up to 17 allocations if they got a /22 each time.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please realize the waiting list is
primarily a mechanism to ensure resources are not
stuck at ARIN, it should not be seen as a reliable
means of obtaining resources. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:45 PM Tom
Pruitt <<a href="mailto:tpruitt@stratusnet.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">tpruitt@stratusnet.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I
do not support the new text, specifically the limit
of a /20 per organization.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">The
limiting of an organization to an aggregate of a /20
is a huge hinderance of the ability of a smaller ISP
to compete. A smaller ISP that can win business on
service and cost could lose that same business due to
simply recouping the IPv4 costs. Large ISPs will
often give the IPs away to win the business, and it
costs them nothing as they received their IPV4 space
for free. Additionally, many smaller ISPs operate in
outlying areas where IPv6 adoption will likely be
slow, which will also hinder their ability to push
IPv6. I’m not sure at what point an organization
becomes “large”, but the smaller organizations are the
ones that will be hurt by this limit.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">What
happens to organizations that are currently on the
wait list that have an aggregate of a /20 or more? Do
they still get a /22. Some of those organizations
have been on the list for over a year. Assuming they
played by the rules and made decisions based on the
assumption that they would get an allotment of IPv4
addresses, denying them any addresses after they have
waited a year or more could be very detrimental to
them. These policy changes and decisions affect the
smaller entities greatly, and they need some clarity.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Thanks<span
style="color:#002060">,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Tom
Pruitt
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Network
Engineer<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Stratus
Networks<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><img
style="width:2.0208in;height:.6875in"
id="gmail-m_-4372306955171240917gmail-m_-5108915643666040281gmail-m_-2059722503508009439Picture_x0020_1"
src="cid:part2.05435669.25911E44@gmail.com"
alt="stratus_networks_logo_FINAL" class=""
width="194" height="66" border="0"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b>From:</b>
ARIN-PPML <<a
href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Andrew Dul<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 6, 2019 4:09 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council
Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet
Requests<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Hello,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I'd like to bring your attention to another issue
that may have been lost in the flurry of other
emails. We are currently in a 14 day feedback period
for the AC's response to the Board's suspension of the
wait-list. Please note the following updated text
for the wait-list. Your comments on this updated text
are welcome.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Andrew<o:p></o:p></p>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>===<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>If no such block is available, the organization will
be provided the option to be placed on a waiting list
of pre-qualified recipients, listing both the block
size, for which the organization is qualified, which
in the case of the waiting list shall not be larger
than a /22, and the smallest block size acceptable to
the organization. An organization may not be added to
the waiting list if it already holds IPv4 resources
amounting in aggregate to more than a /20 of address
space. Resources received via section 4.1.8 may not be
transferred within 60 months of the issuance date. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><br>
<br>
-------- Forwarded Message -------- <o:p></o:p></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" cellspacing="0"
cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top"
nowrap="nowrap">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:right"
align="right">
<b><span style="color:windowtext">Subject: </span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="color:windowtext">[arin-ppml]
Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding
NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top"
nowrap="nowrap">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:right"
align="right">
<b><span style="color:windowtext">Date: </span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="color:windowtext">Mon, 29 Apr 2019
11:16:31 -0400<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top"
nowrap="nowrap">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:right"
align="right">
<b><span style="color:windowtext">From: </span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="color:windowtext">ARIN
<a href="mailto:info@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><info@arin.net></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top"
nowrap="nowrap">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-align:right"
align="right">
<b><span style="color:windowtext">To: </span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="color:windowtext"><a
href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><br>
<br>
Subject:<br>
<br>
At their 16 January Meeting, the Board of Trustees
suspended issuance of number resources under NRPM
section 4.1.8.2. (Fulfilling Unmet Needs), and
referred NRPM section 4.1.8 to the ARIN Advisory
Council for their recommendation.<br>
<br>
The Advisory Council has provided its
recommendation, and per ARIN's Policy Development
Process, the recommendation is hereby submitted to
the Public Policy Mailing List for a community
discussion period of 14 days, to conclude on 13 May.<br>
<br>
Once completed, the Board of Trustees will review
the AC’s recommendation and the PPML discussion.<br>
<br>
The full text of the Advisory Council's
recommendation is below.<br>
<br>
Board of Trustees meeting minutes are available at:<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/board/meetings/2019_0116/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/board/meetings/2019_0116/</a><br>
<br>
For more details on the Policy Development Process,
visit:<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sean Hopkins<br>
Policy Analyst<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Advisory Council recommendation:<br>
<br>
In accordance with section 10.2 of the ARIN Policy
Development Process, the ARIN Advisory Council
recommends the following actions to the Board of
Trustees in response to the Board’s suspension of
part of the operation of sections 4.1.8, 4.1.8.1 and
4.1.8.2 of the Numbering Resource Policy Manual:<br>
<br>
Replace section 4.1.8 as follows, then reinstate the
full operation of sections 4.1.8, 4.1.8.1 and
4.1.8.2 immediately.<br>
<br>
4.1.8. Unmet Requests<br>
<br>
In the event that ARIN does not have a contiguous
block of addresses of sufficient size to fulfill a
qualified request, ARIN will provide the requesting
organization with the option to specify the smallest
block size they’d be willing to accept, equal to or
larger than the applicable minimum size specified
elsewhere in ARIN policy. If such a smaller block is
available, ARIN will fulfill the request with the
largest single block available that fulfills the
request.<br>
<br>
If no such block is available, the organization will
be provided the option to be placed on a waiting
list of pre-qualified recipients, listing both the
block size, for which the organization is qualified,
which in the case of the waiting list shall not be
larger than a /22, and the smallest block size
acceptable to the organization. An organization may
not be added to the waiting list if it already holds
IPv4 resources amounting in aggregate to more than a
/20 of address space. Resources received via section
4.1.8 may not be transferred within 60 months of the
issuance date.<br>
<br>
Repeated requests, in a manner that would circumvent
4.1.6, are not allowed: an organization may only
receive one allocation, assignment, or transfer
every 3 months, but ARIN, at its sole discretion,
may waive this requirement if the requester can
document a change in circumstances since their last
request that could not have been reasonably foreseen
at the time of the original request, and which now
justifies additional space. Qualified requesters
whose request cannot be immediately met will also be
advised of the availability of the transfer
mechanism in section 8.3 as an alternative mechanism
to obtain IPv4 addresses.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ARIN-PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are
subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a
href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription
at:<br>
<a
href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a>
if you experience any issues.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
ARIN-PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed
to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a
href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a
href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">info@arin.net</a>
if you experience any issues.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">===============================================<br>
David Farmer <a
href="mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">
Email:farmer@umn.edu</a><br>
Networking & Telecommunication Services<br>
Office of Information Technology<br>
University of Minnesota <br>
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815<br>
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952<br>
=============================================== <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a>
Please contact <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>