<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr"></div>
<div dir="ltr">On May 2, 2019, at 12:19 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>> wrote:</div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If a member is abusing the rights of other members, by hijacking their resources, then the registry information is not valid, at least during the time this event is happening.</span><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Jordi -</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">If you mean during a “route hijacking”, then you would be incorrect with respect the ARIN registry not being accurate at such times. During such events, the registry is accurate despite difference from the current routing state.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Members abusing the rights of other members doesn’t automatically make it an RIR issue – for example, a member may be trespassing in anothers facility and that shouldn’t warrant RIR action.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Members interfering with rights of other members _when those rights are provided by the membership organization_ do provide a cause of action. However, since ARIN doesn’t provide any routing rights (despite some people’s beliefs to the contrary),
it doesn’t have a corresponding role in enforcement of routing rights.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">It is certainly possible to change the rights provided with address block issuance to include routing responsibilities, but that’s a rather significant change compared to ARIN’s present scope of operations.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Thanks!</div>
<div dir="ltr">/John</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">John Curran</div>
<div dir="ltr">President and CEO</div>
<div dir="ltr">American Registry for Internet Numbers</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>