<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-CA" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I also support this draft policy as written, no more jumping to the front of the queue. Go IPv6.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Orin Roberts<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Brian Jones<br>
<b>Sent:</b> November-22-17 9:31 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> ARIN <info@arin.net><br>
<b>Cc:</b> arin-ppml@arin.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-10: Repeal of Immediate Need for IPv4 Address Space (NRPM Section 4.2.1.6)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I support this draft policy as written. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Brian Jones <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Nov 21, 2017, 17:42 ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">On 16 November 2017, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced<br>
"ARIN-prop-245: Repeal of Immediate Need for IPv4 Address Space (NRPM<br>
Section 4.2.1.6)" to Draft Policy status.<br>
<br>
Draft Policy ARIN-2017-10 is below and can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_10.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_10.html</a><br>
<br>
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will<br>
evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft<br>
policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as<br>
stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these<br>
principles are:<br>
<br>
* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration<br>
* Technically Sound<br>
* Supported by the Community<br>
<br>
The PDP can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html</a><br>
<br>
Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sean Hopkins<br>
Policy Analyst<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Draft Policy ARIN-2017-10: Repeal of Immediate Need for IPv4 Address<br>
Space (NRPM Section 4.2.1.6)<br>
<br>
Problem Statement:<br>
<br>
Section 4.2.1.6 of the ARIN Numbering Resource Policy Manual (NRPM)<br>
provides that an ISP having an immediate need for IPv4 address space<br>
that will be utilized within thirty days of a request may obtain a block<br>
of IPv4 address space of the size specified in section 4.2.1.6 from ARIN<br>
on an exceptional basis. However, as noted in the ARIN 40 Policy<br>
Experience Report, since IPv4 exhaustion, obtaining IPv4 addresses in<br>
this manner is no longer possible as a practical matter. Instead an ISP<br>
must join the waiting list and wait until it reaches the front of the<br>
queue to obtain any IPv4 address space, however long that may take. In<br>
effect, section 4.2.1.6 is non-operative. Accordingly, its continued<br>
presence in the NRPM is misleading and confusing.<br>
<br>
Policy statement:<br>
<br>
Section 4.2.1.6 of the NRPM is hereby repealed and section number<br>
4.2.1.6 is hereby retired.<br>
<br>
Comments:<br>
<br>
a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate<br>
<br>
b. Comments: Given the constraints created by the exhaustion of IPv4<br>
addresses, this proposal does not require any changes in the current<br>
ARIN practices for the allocation of IPv4 address space.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>