<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Kevin Blumberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevinb@thewire.ca" target="_blank">kevinb@thewire.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Andrew,<br><br>
3) Why is the scope limited to post-secondary institution when many smaller communities would not have that? Could accredited educational institution be used instead?<br><br></blockquote></div><br>Kevin &c,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">There are educational institutions that would perhaps qualify as a volunteer or non-profit that would not qualify as an accredited institution — accreditation is largely outside the reach of organizations that I believe this policy is targeting.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Is it necessary to limit to accredited educational institutions? Is it possible to have a for-profit educational institution that would otherwise qualify for a community network designation?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Does the policy need to reference education at all?<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Jeremy Austin<br>Whitestone, Alaska</div>
</div></div>