<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I support this proposal.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I am scratching my head at the apparent lack of logic in this claim:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<p style="margin-left:5.25pt">In addition, I am not convinced that it should be ARIN's role to correct perceived global RIR framework inbalances?<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">The reciprocity requirement is the policy that makes it ARIN’s role to correct potential imbalances, not this policy. We need to remove those requirements.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Dr. Milton L Mueller<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Professor,
<a href="http://spp.gatech.edu/"><span style="color:#0563C1">School of Public Policy</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Georgia Institute of Technology<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Internet Governance Project
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><a href="http://internetgovernance.org/"><span style="color:#0563C1">http://internetgovernance.org/</span></a>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p>We currently have a working policy strategy in this area, and I think we should stick with it for now.<br>
rd<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sep 7, 2017 9:39 AM, <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-request@arin.net">arin-ppml-request@arin.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-request@arin.net">arin-ppml-request@arin.net</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-owner@arin.net">arin-ppml-owner@arin.net</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for<br>
Inter-RIR Transfers (Michael Winters)<br>
2. Re: Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for<br>
Inter-RIR Transfers (Kevin Blumberg)<br>
3. Re: Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for<br>
Inter-RIR Transfers (Mike Burns)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:21:01 +0000<br>
From: Michael Winters <<a href="mailto:mwinters@edwardrose.com">mwinters@edwardrose.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity<br>
Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:947590f72de642d690bb464342a2ea16@kz-mail01.manifold.edwardrosekzoo.com">947590f72de642d690bb464342a2ea16@kz-mail01.manifold.edwardrosekzoo.com</a>><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
I am opposed to this policy.<br>
<br>
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of Chris Woodfield<br>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 5:19 PM<br>
To: Cj Aronson <<a href="mailto:cja@daydream.com">cja@daydream.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
This policy proposal seems, to me, as an attempt to correct a historical imbalance in the distribution of IPv4 resources to various RIRs, since the vast majority of legacy space - which, to my eyes, it seems that much of the transfer supply is originating from
- is in the ARIN region.<br>
<br>
Given that, this policy only makes sense up to the point that such imbalance still exists. If we simply named the target RIRs, we could result in a (arguably theoretical) situation where Afrinic and Lacnic wind up transferring enough space to push their totals
over the average but are still permitted to transfer space. if that were to happen, it would require a subsequent policy change to keep that imbalance from growing worse.<br>
<br>
As such, I support as written and would argue against an approach that targets specific RIRs by name.<br>
<br>
-C<br>
<br>
On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Cj Aronson <<a href="mailto:cja@daydream.com">cja@daydream.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:cja@daydream.com">cja@daydream.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Okay so this formula.. does it just give us Afrinic and Lacnic right? So why don't we just say that? Since there are only 5 RIRs it seems that maybe a formula isn't needed?<br>
<br>
<br>
{?,?}<br>
(( ))<br>
? ?<br>
<br>
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:35 PM, ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
The following has been revised:<br>
<br>
* Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
Revised text is below and can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html</a><br>
<br>
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP).
Specifically, these principles are:<br>
<br>
* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration<br>
* Technically Sound<br>
* Supported by the Community<br>
<br>
The PDP can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html</a><br>
<br>
Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sean Hopkins<br>
Policy Analyst<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
Version Date: 6 September 2017<br>
<br>
Problem Statement:<br>
<br>
AFRINIC and LACNIC are currently considering one-way inter-RIR transfer proposals. Those RIR communities feel a one-way policy a policy that allows network operators in their regions to obtain space from another region and transfer it into AFRINIC and LACNIC
may best meet the needs of the operators in that region.<br>
<br>
ARIN staff, in reply to an inquiry from AFRINIC, have formally indicated that ARINs 8.4 policy language will not allow ARIN to participate in such one-way transfers. The staff formally indicate to AFRINIC that the word reciprocal in 8.4 prohibits ARIN from
allowing ARIN-registered space to transfer directly to AFRINIC (in this context).<br>
<br>
ARIN as a community should recognize that other RIR operator communities have different needs than we do. We should recognize that:<br>
<br>
- network operators in AFRINIC in LACNIC have need to obtain space in the market;<br>
<br>
- have reasons they think are important to not allow two-way transfers; and<br>
<br>
- we should understand that the history of the RIR system has led to LACNIC and AFRINIC having multiple orders of magnitude less IPv4 address space than ARIN does.<br>
<br>
Policy statement:<br>
<br>
Add the following sentence after the first sentence of NRPM 8.4:<br>
<br>
Inter-RIR transfers may take place to an RIR with a non-reciprocal inter-RIR transfer policy only when the recipient RIR has an IPv4 total inventory less than the average (mean) of the IPv4 total inventory among all of the RIRs.<br>
<br>
Timetable for implementation: Upon the ratification of any inter-RIR transfer policy at another RIR that is one-way as described in the problem statement.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> if you experience any issues.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> if you experience any issues.<br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170907/ba57cf2e/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170907/ba57cf2e/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:30:22 +0000<br>
From: Kevin Blumberg <<a href="mailto:kevinb@thewire.ca">kevinb@thewire.ca</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity<br>
Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:7E7773B523E82C478734E793E58F69E7A52773A8@SBS2011.thewireinc.local">7E7773B523E82C478734E793E58F69E7A52773A8@SBS2011.thewireinc.local</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Are there active polices in the other regions that rely on this policy? I understand there have been discussions, however I don't know what the status is/was.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Kevin Blumberg<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of ARIN<br>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:36 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
The following has been revised:<br>
<br>
* Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
Revised text is below and can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html</a><br>
<br>
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP).
Specifically, these principles are:<br>
<br>
* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration<br>
* Technically Sound<br>
* Supported by the Community<br>
<br>
The PDP can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html</a><br>
<br>
Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sean Hopkins<br>
Policy Analyst<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
Version Date: 6 September 2017<br>
<br>
Problem Statement:<br>
<br>
AFRINIC and LACNIC are currently considering one-way inter-RIR transfer proposals. Those RIR communities feel a one-way policy a policy that allows network operators in their regions to obtain space from another region and transfer it into AFRINIC and LACNIC
may best meet the needs of the operators in that region.<br>
<br>
ARIN staff, in reply to an inquiry from AFRINIC, have formally indicated that ARINs 8.4 policy language will not allow ARIN to participate in such one-way transfers. The staff formally indicate to AFRINIC that the word reciprocal in 8.4 prohibits ARIN from
allowing ARIN-registered space to transfer directly to AFRINIC (in this context).<br>
<br>
ARIN as a community should recognize that other RIR operator communities have different needs than we do. We should recognize that:<br>
<br>
- network operators in AFRINIC in LACNIC have need to obtain space in the market;<br>
<br>
- have reasons they think are important to not allow two-way transfers; and<br>
<br>
- we should understand that the history of the RIR system has led to LACNIC and AFRINIC having multiple orders of magnitude less IPv4 address space than ARIN does.<br>
<br>
Policy statement:<br>
<br>
Add the following sentence after the first sentence of NRPM 8.4:<br>
<br>
Inter-RIR transfers may take place to an RIR with a non-reciprocal inter-RIR transfer policy only when the recipient RIR has an IPv4 total inventory less than the average (mean) of the IPv4 total inventory among all of the RIRs.<br>
<br>
Timetable for implementation: Upon the ratification of any inter-RIR transfer policy at another RIR that is one-way as described in the problem statement.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:39:02 -0400<br>
From: "Mike Burns" <<a href="mailto:mike@iptrading.com">mike@iptrading.com</a>><br>
To: "'Kevin Blumberg'" <<a href="mailto:kevinb@thewire.ca">kevinb@thewire.ca</a>>, <<a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity<br>
Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
Message-ID: <030f01d327de$ab148cb0$013da610$@<a href="http://iptrading.com" target="_blank">iptrading.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Hi Kevin,<br>
<br>
LACNIC will be presented with a one-way policy proposal in Montevideo in a<br>
few weeks. It has failed to reach consensus twice but was returned to the<br>
list, so it will be voted on again.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2017-2" target="_blank">https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2017-2</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of Kevin<br>
Blumberg<br>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 8:30 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity<br>
Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
Are there active polices in the other regions that rely on this policy? I<br>
understand there have been discussions, however I don't know what the status<br>
is/was.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Kevin Blumberg<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of ARIN<br>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:36 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: [arin-ppml] Revised: ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement<br>
for Inter-RIR Transfers<br>
<br>
The following has been revised:<br>
<br>
* Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR<br>
Transfers<br>
<br>
Revised text is below and can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html</a><br>
<br>
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will<br>
evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft<br>
policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated<br>
in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:<br>
<br>
* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration<br>
* Technically Sound<br>
* Supported by the Community<br>
<br>
The PDP can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html</a><br>
<br>
Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:<br>
<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sean Hopkins<br>
Policy Analyst<br>
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR<br>
Transfers<br>
<br>
Version Date: 6 September 2017<br>
<br>
Problem Statement:<br>
<br>
AFRINIC and LACNIC are currently considering one-way inter-RIR transfer<br>
proposals. Those RIR communities feel a one-way policy a policy that allows<br>
network operators in their regions to obtain space from another region and<br>
transfer it into AFRINIC and LACNIC may best meet the needs of the operators<br>
in that region.<br>
<br>
ARIN staff, in reply to an inquiry from AFRINIC, have formally indicated<br>
that ARINs 8.4 policy language will not allow ARIN to participate in such<br>
one-way transfers. The staff formally indicate to AFRINIC that the word<br>
reciprocal in 8.4 prohibits ARIN from allowing ARIN-registered space to<br>
transfer directly to AFRINIC (in this context).<br>
<br>
ARIN as a community should recognize that other RIR operator communities<br>
have different needs than we do. We should recognize that:<br>
<br>
- network operators in AFRINIC in LACNIC have need to obtain space in the<br>
market;<br>
<br>
- have reasons they think are important to not allow two-way transfers; and<br>
<br>
- we should understand that the history of the RIR system has led to LACNIC<br>
and AFRINIC having multiple orders of magnitude less IPv4 address space than<br>
ARIN does.<br>
<br>
Policy statement:<br>
<br>
Add the following sentence after the first sentence of NRPM 8.4:<br>
<br>
Inter-RIR transfers may take place to an RIR with a non-reciprocal inter-RIR<br>
transfer policy only when the recipient RIR has an IPv4 total inventory less<br>
than the average (mean) of the IPv4 total inventory among all of the RIRs.<br>
<br>
Timetable for implementation: Upon the ratification of any inter-RIR<br>
transfer policy at another RIR that is one-way as described in the problem<br>
statement.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public<br>
Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public<br>
Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ARIN-PPML mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 147, Issue 7<br>
*****************************************<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>