<div dir="ltr">Oppose as written, agree with all of Andy's points.<div><br></div><div>-Austin<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Hadenfeldt, Andrew C <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Andrew.C.Hadenfeldt@windstream.com" target="_blank">Andrew.C.Hadenfeldt@windstream.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_8562786561532260364WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Oppose as written, +1 on the points below (leave /29 alone, and would prefer to see /56 rather than /60)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">-Andy</span></i><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> ARIN-PPML [mailto:<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net" target="_blank">arin-ppml-bounces@<wbr>arin.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>William Herrin<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:02 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net" target="_blank">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6<br>
<br>
Policy statement:<br>
<br>
Amend 4.2.3.7.1 of the policy manual to strike "/29 or more" and change to "more than a /28".<u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hello,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In my opinion...<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Leave /29 alone or change it to "more than a single IP address." In these days of IPv4 shortage, substantial networks sit behind small blocks of public addresses. These networks should be documented with reachable POCs lest the anti-spam/virus/malware
folks slam down /24 filters for lack of information about how misbehaving networks are partitioned.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Amend 6.5.5.1 of the policy manual to strike "/64 or more" and change to "more than a /60".<u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Change this to "more than a /56." Service providers should NOT be assigning /64's to end users. If you're doing that, you're doing it wrong. An IPv6 customer should be able to have more than one /64 subnet without resorting to NAT so /60
should be the absolute minimum end-user assignment, equivalent for all intents and purposes to an IPv4 /32. If we then want "equivalence" to the /29 policy so that individuals with the minimum and near-minimum assignment do not need to be SWIPed, it makes
sense to move the next subnetting level up. In IPv6, assignment is strongly recommended on nibble boundaries, so that means /56.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Regards,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bill Herrin<br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
-- <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">William Herrin ................ <a href="mailto:herrin@dirtside.com" target="_blank">
herrin@dirtside.com</a> <a href="mailto:bill@herrin.us" target="_blank">bill@herrin.us</a><br>
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <<a href="http://www.dirtside.com/" target="_blank">http://www.dirtside.com/</a>><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
<div>
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.<br>
</div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br></blockquote></div><br></div>