<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div>Thank you John.</div><div><br></div><div>I reiterate my last post. The criterion is obsolete and this recommended draft policy should proceed through PDP.</div><div><br>On May 12, 2016, at 6:37 PM, John Curran <<a href="mailto:jcurran@arin.net">jcurran@arin.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
On May 12, 2016, at 5:56 PM, David Huberman <<a href="mailto:daveid@panix.com" class="">daveid@panix.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">John,<br class="">
<br class="">
1) how many 8.3 transfers have been approved as of 30 April 2016?<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Do you mean transfers since IPv4 transfer policy inception, or simply in 2015?</div>
<div>(They are all listed here: <a href="https://www.arin.net/knowledge/statistics/transfers.html" class="">https://www.arin.net/knowledge/statistics/transfers.html</a>)</div>
<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">2) of those, how many were reviewed and verified with the explicit requirement that 25% of the requested space to be transferred-in would be used immediately?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div>Such a requirement could only be applicable transfers to end-users who were demonstrating </div>
<div>their 24-month need using NRPM 4.3.3, and there is no clear interpretation for application of</div>
<div>the "25% immediate utilization rate” language. As such, it is not directly considered during</div>
<div>the process (as elaborated by Richard Jimmerson on the list); therefore none were “reviewed</div>
<div>and verified explicitly” for that purpose.</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Note that the language remains applicable (and organizations that attempt to transfer without</div>
<div>having immediate utilization do run the risk of number resource fraud), but is not integrated </div>
<div>into the end-user transfer review process as its extrapolation into that context is unclear. </div>
<div>This is also why the staff and legal review for draft policy 2015-3 notes - "This policy would </div>
<div>more closely align with the way staff applies the existing policy in relation to 8.3 transfers.”</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Thanks!</div>
<div>/John</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>John Curran</div>
<div>President and CEO</div>
<div>ARIN</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>