<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div>On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:11 PM, Gary Buhrmaster <<a href="mailto:gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com">gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:55 PM, ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:</span><br><span>....</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>Policy statement:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Add to Section 8.3 and Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of the</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>transfer:"</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer.</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>I am in favor of the intent, although I would have</span><br><span>(at first thought) expected that the "resources</span><br><span>transferred will be subject to ARIN policies"</span><br><span>would have resulted in a review of the recipients</span><br><span>planned usage. However, given the possible</span><br><span>interpretations (which historically any ambiguity</span><br><span>goes in favor of the requester), I can see that</span><br><span>some improvements might be valuable. However,</span><br><span>I would suggest that the proposed language be</span><br><span>modified to allow for a transfer if the recipient</span><br><span>would otherwise meet the requirements that could</span><br><span>be used to approve the resources from the reserved</span><br><span>block.</span><br><span></span><br><span>What about something like:</span><br><span></span><br><font color="#000000"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">"Recipients of resources from a reserved pool ....</span></font></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><font color="#000000"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">must demonstrate that the recipient would<br>qualify for those resources under existing policy,<br>and the resources may not be transferred out<br>of region".</span></font></blockquote><div><br></div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I like this approach better than the originally proposed text. To prevent ambiguity around which existing policy applies, perhaps:</span><br><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><font color="#000000"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">"Recipients of resources from a reserved pool ....<br>must demonstrate that the recipient would<br>qualify for those resources under the policy criteria for that reserved pool. Resources from such reserved pools are not eligible for inter-RIR transfer."</span></font></blockquote><br></div><div>-Scott</div></body></html>