<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>The ARIN community previously considered these ideas under 2014-16, but changing the /10 to something other than transition never had sufficient support for the AC to move it forward.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_16.html">https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_16.html</a><br><br>.Andrew</div><div><br>On Oct 20, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Morizot Timothy S <<a href="mailto:Timothy.S.Morizot@irs.gov">Timothy.S.Morizot@irs.gov</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Thanks for the clarifications. In that context, assuming a new entrant is deploying IPv6, wouldn't the current policy allow them to request allocations to support that deployment. It specifically mentions needs like dual-stacked nameservers and various IPv4 life extension solutions. If a new entrant *isn't* deploying IPv6 from the start, do we really want to support them with a free pool allocation? For any needs beyond those described in the policy, there's the transfer market. I don't know that I have particularly strong feelings either way, but if we're going to reserve any general use pool at all rather than simply handing it all out to meet current need, I think it's better to tie it to demonstrated IPv6 deployment.</span><br><span></span><br><span>Scott</span><br><span></span><br><span>-----Original Message-----</span><br><span>From: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a> [<a href="mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net">mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of Spears, Christopher M.</span><br><span>Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:21 AM</span><br><span>To: Hadenfeldt, Andrew C</span><br><span>Cc: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a></span><br><span>Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Transition /10</span><br><span></span><br><span>NRPM 4.10 [1] dedicated /10 for IPv6 "transition"..</span><br><span></span><br><span>I tossed a similar idea around with some folks at ARIN36. Use this /10 to allocate a /24 per **new** Org, and steer subsequent transactions to transfers. That would ensure IPv4 for ~16K **new** entrants in the coming years.. </span><br><span></span><br><span>[1] <a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10">https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>PPML</span><br><span>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to</span><br><span>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).</span><br><span>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:</span><br><span><a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a></span><br><span>Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.</span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>