<div dir="ltr">I totally agree. Are you interested in taking a pass and suggesting any changes you see warranted?<div><br></div><div>-Scott</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Jose R. de la Cruz III <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jrdelacruz@acm.org" target="_blank">jrdelacruz@acm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Good idea. But maybe the whole NPRM needs to be looked, and not just removing sections. One way to go might be to inspect each section header and decide if the policies included in it are relevant or should be joined with other sections (maybe sections 4 & 6 should be only one).<br><br></div>Jose <br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Scott Leibrand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scottleibrand@gmail.com" target="_blank">scottleibrand@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr">
<p class="MsoNormal">In light of this afternoon's discussion about simplification of the NPRM, I thought I'd dust off a post-exhaustion NRPM 4 simplification proposal I wrote a couple years ago. There are a lot of parts that need updating in light of more recent modifications (expect another email later), but there are a few that seem rather simple and uncontroversial. Can anyone think of any reason not to submit a proposal with all four of these? Anyone interested in (co-)authoring it?</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">1. Delete from 4.1.6 Aggregation the text that reads “ARIN may
reserve space to maximize aggregation possibilities until the implementation of
section 10.4.2.2, at which time”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rationale: remove inoperative text</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Delete section 4.2.1.2 Annual Renewal.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rationale: Remove operational details (already covered by
the RSA and ARIN procedures) from NRPM.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Delete section 4.2.2.1.1. Use of /24</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rationale: After exhaustion, many organizations can no
longer get a /24 from their upstream ISP, and need to be able to get their
initial allocation from ARIN.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">4. Delete section 4.2.3.2. VLSM</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rationale: VLSM and CIDR are now standard practice, and don’t
need to be called out in NRPM.</p><span><font color="#888888">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">-Scott</p>
</font></span></div>
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>