<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">John -<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Apologies if I wasn’t entirely clear. As referenced in Section 9.3.1. of the APNIC INPP, I propose that this also applies to end users - allowing end users to, free of charge, receive a /48 for each /24 they hold.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards,</div><div class="">Alfie</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div style=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 11 Aug 2015, at 23:01, John Curran <<a href="mailto:jcurran@arin.net" class="">jcurran@arin.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Alfie Cleveland <<a href="mailto:alfeh@me.com" class="">alfeh@me.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hello,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically make organisations eligible for IPv6 if they hold justified IPv4 space. This similar to <span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Section
9.3.1. of the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies. I feel that if organisations were able to receive a /48 for each /24 they hold, then it would help expedite the rollout of IPv6. Organisations currently have two choices - continue to use IPv4,
or spend valuable time on applying for IPv6 space. IPv6 space is clearly in abundance - and this could potentially help slow the exhaustion of IPv4.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Alfie -</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Per NRPM 6.5.2.2, an ISP qualifies for an IPv6 allocation if they have a previously justified IPv4 ISP </div>
<div class="">allocation from ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries), or can qualify for an IPv4 ISP allocation </div>
<div class="">under current criteria; i.e. this means that they presently are automatically eligible for IPv6 if they </div>
<div class="">hold IPv4 space, as you suggest above.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Perhaps you are proposing that there be a default automatic size of IPv6 allocation ("a /48 for each</div>
<div class="">/24 they hold”) which would allow for more expeditious preparation of IPv6 initial requests, for those </div>
<div class="">who choose to receive this default allocation size rather than calculating the "smallest nibble-boundary </div>
<div class="">aligned block that can provide an equally sized nibble-boundary aligned block to each of the requesters </div>
<div class="">serving sites large enough to satisfy the needs of the requesters largest single serving site using no </div>
<div class="">more than 75% of the available addresses”? </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">/John</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">John Curran</div>
<div class="">President and CEO</div>
<div class="">ARIN</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>