<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/23/2015 3:55 PM, Scott Leibrand
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGkMwz4HTf9Vi0+ynuNV4UphqLqH2HZKXSYV8v9WzSa3zm6b8Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM,
William Herrin <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:bill@herrin.us"
target="_blank">bill@herrin.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6<br>
> Transfers and Multi-national Networks<br>
<br>
</span>OPPOSED.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Noted. Can you read over my comments below, and then
note why you think it's a bad idea to ignore the <span
style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">geographic location
where an organization is utilizing its ARIN-registered
addresses when evaluating transfer requests? I'm hoping
to hear the consequentialist argument behind your
position, independent of the appeal to authority (of the
PDP) that you gave below.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Policy
violates PDP section 3.2. The policy requires ARIN to
consider<br>
addresses used outside the region but the PDP restricts
policy scope<br>
to "number resources managed within the ARIN region."<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I believe that is the whole point: while these number
resources may be *used* outside the ARIN region, they are
still *managed* within the ARIN region (by a multinational
network with meaningful business that operates in the ARIN
region, and is <span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">currently
using IPv4 or IPv6 addresses in the ARIN region). So I
don't see a conflict with the PDP here, just a
disagreement with the principle of allowing use of
ARIN-issued and -managed addresses outside the ARIN
region.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Makes sense to me. My management consoles rarely run in the same
region where my VMs do.<br>
<br>
Matthew Kaufman<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:matthew@matthew.at">matthew@matthew.at</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>