<html><head></head><body>Conversely, why is it OK for an American organization to impose policies controlling how a company does business in another part of the world?<br>
David's argument and problem make sense to me. Affected orgs will just work around the ARIN rules, like they always have...<br>
-Adam<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On May 26, 2015 3:24:19 PM CDT, Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On 5/26/15 12:57, David Huberman wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> There is no BGP in China without IP addresses registered in CNNIC. It's against the law. We, and many other ARIN-region operators, have networks to build and run in China. We cannot do so with the 24 month anti-flip rule in place.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Why is another region's policy problem or restrictions something that <br />needs fixing through ARIN policy?<br /><br />~Seth<br /><hr /><br />PPML<br />You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br />the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).<br />Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br /><a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br />Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<br
/></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>