<div dir="ltr"><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">Hi everyone!  This recommended draft policy was just presented at the Public Policy Consultation at NANOG in Washington.  Please review and comment if you have any input for or against this proposal.  Thanks! </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">-----Cathy</span></div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><div><br></div><div>-----------------------------------------------------</div>2013-8 New Subsequent Allocation</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">s for new multiple discrete networks</span><div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px"><span style="line-height:1.5em">Policy Statement:</span><br></p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">
IPv4:</p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">Add the following statement to section 4.5.4.</p></div><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">
Upon verificatio<span style="font-size:12.666666984558105px">n that the organization has shown evidence of deployment of the new discrete network site,<span style="line-height:1.5em"> the new network(s) shall be allocated the minimum allocation size under section 4.2.1.5 unless the organization can demonstrate additional need using the immediate need criteria (4.2.1.6).</span></span></p>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.666666984558105px"><img src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif"></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.666666984558105px"><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">
IPv6:</p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">Add an additional reference to section 6.11.5.b such that it references both the initial allocation and subsequent allocation sections of the IPv6 LIR policy.</p>
<p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">"Each network will be judged against the existing utilization criteria specified in 6.5.2 and 6.5.3 as if it were a separate organization..."</p>
<p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px"></p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">Comments:</p>
<p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">a. Timetable for implementation: immediate</p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">
b. This policy is being proposed based upon the Policy Implementation & Experience Report from ARIN 32.</p><p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px"><a href="https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_32/PDF/thursday/nobile-policy.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_32/PDF/thursday/nobile-policy.pdf</a></p>
<p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px">c: Older versions of the MDN policy did contain new network criteria. This criteria appears to have been dropped during subsequent rewrites of the MDN policy. "The organization must not allocate a CIDR block larger than the current minimum assignment size of the RIR (currently /20 for ARIN) to a new network." (<a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/nrpm_20041015.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/nrpm_20041015.pdf</a>)</p>
<p style="line-height:1.5em;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;margin:0.5em 0px;border:0px;padding:0px"> </p></div></div></div>