<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I support.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Steven Ryerse<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">President<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">www.eclipse-networks.com<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">770.656.1460 - Cell<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">770.399.9099- Office<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"MS Mincho";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><img width="56" height="37" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01CF68AF.55FEA130" alt="Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png"></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"MS Mincho";color:#1F497D">℠</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Eclipse Networks, Inc.</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"><sup><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> Conquering Complex Networks</span></sup><sup><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">℠<o:p></o:p></span></sup></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:6.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black">> On May 5, 2014, at 7:23 PM, "<a href="mailto:sandrabrown@ipv4marketgroup.com">sandrabrown@ipv4marketgroup.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:sandrabrown@ipv4marketgroup.com">sandrabrown@ipv4marketgroup.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> <br>
> I support the policy in that it helps companies in the region and I do<br>
> not see any harm to any entities in the region. The problem David<br>
> Huberman is trying to solve is that there are IP's being used out of<br>
> region, and we all know out of region use has lots of geo-location<br>
> issues, and for some companies, routing issues, and he needs these IP's<br>
> to be registered in the region they are used. Coupled with the fact<br>
> there would not be any IP's available to his company from the free pool<br>
> for the next 12 months, there is no harm. <br>
> <br>
> The only thing we don't know is whether this is a one-off problem, or<br>
> whether other companies have the same issue. I would think other<br>
> companies have the same problem but are not commenting. I suspect the<br>
> people at ARIN33 felt the problem should be solved, but that it didn't<br>
> apply to them so they are not being as vocal now. The shepherds could<br>
> contact companies with a profile similar to David Huberman's and see if<br>
> it would be of service to them. <br>
> <br>
> It would seem that the more freedom there is to transfer IP's between<br>
> registries, the easier it will be to conduct business globally, and the<br>
> more critical the role of the RIR in the future. <br>
> <br>
> It is not a harmful policy.<br>
> <br>
> Sandra Brown<br>
> IPv4 Market Group.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Should we abandon this Draft?<br>
> <br>
> After the Chicago Public Policy Meeting, based upon the community's<br>
> suggestion that the AC continue to work on this Draft. ?I sent an email<br>
> to PPML asking for support or opposition to this Draft and received just<br>
> 2 responses....both in opposition.<br>
> <br>
> I reiterate that PPML message below and once again ask for your support<br>
> or opposition. Failing to generate greater support for this Draft and<br>
> given that the AC has approximately 20 proposals and drafts on its<br>
> docket.....I plan to make a motion at the next AC monthly meeting<br>
> recommending abandoning this Draft Policy for lack of community<br>
> support......<br>
> <br>
> Now is your opportunity to convince the community that this a worthwhile<br>
> effort....or not.<br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> <br>
> Bill Darte<br>
> AC Shepherd for 2014-2<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Draft Policy Issue:<br>
> Simply, the author wishes the Anti-Flip language currently used in the<br>
> NRPM to be relaxed, allowing an Inter-RIR transfer within their own<br>
> organization of previously existing addresses....though they may have<br>
> received a new allocation or assignment within the last 12 months.<br>
> <br>
> Current draft language states that the organization may do such a<br>
> transfer, but may not use the actual addresses which were received from<br>
> ARIN (or through transfer) in the previous 12 months. ?But they could<br>
> therefore transfer other resources holdings.<br>
> <br>
> Request for feedback:<br>
> In order to further this discussion and gain a consensus, I would like<br>
> to once again ask the community to speak in favor or against this Draft<br>
> Policy so that it may be presented and discussed at our next Public<br>
> Policy Consultation at NANOG in June.<br>
> <br>
> 1. Yes or No. ?Should the community relax existing policy which attempts<br>
> to limit the transfer of ARIN resources out of region, in order to allow<br>
> an organization flexibility to move address blocks to another portion of<br>
> their own organization in another region, even though they might have<br>
> received different addresses within ARIN in the last 12 months??<br>
> <br>
> (Note current policy would still restrict availability of new addresses<br>
> to the organization for a period of 12 months after the transfer and is<br>
> not being changed by this draft).<br>
> <br>
> 2. ?If YES above, are there any other qualifications or limits that<br>
> should be imposed on the resources transferred or the organization?<br>
> <br>
> (Note that a vote of NO to question #1 would essentially ask the<br>
> Advisory Council to abandon this draft policy leaving existing policy in<br>
> place.)<br>
> <br>
> Thanks to all who continue to work within the community to exercise<br>
> their right and duty to craft appropriate policy guiding ARIN's<br>
> important role in Internet number resource management.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> PPML<br>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
> Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>