<div><br></div><div><br></div>Should the board step in? <div><br></div><div>By the time this gets turned from beef to chicken in the "process" and then brought forward it will have already caused more damage than ever before. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Support. <span></span><br><div><br></div><div>Best, </div><div><br></div><div>-M<<br><div><br><div><br>On Monday, April 28, 2014, Steven Ryerse <<a href="mailto:SRyerse@eclipse-networks.com">SRyerse@eclipse-networks.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I agree it is past time to do this as it is ARIN's reason to exist to allocate.<br>
<br>
<br>
Steven Ryerse<br>
President<br>
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338<br>
<a href="http://www.eclipse-networks.com" target="_blank">www.eclipse-networks.com</a><br>
770.656.1460 - Cell<br>
770.399.9099- Office<br>
<br>
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.<br>
Conquering Complex Networks℠<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a>arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a> [mailto:<a>arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>] On Behalf Of David Huberman<br>
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:13 PM<br>
To: Michael Peddemors; <a>arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Ip allocation<br>
<br>
Full support. Making a single ISP initial allocation criteria that opens a /22 (or more!) to all first timers would be about 10 years past due, but still helpful to the community ARIN serves.<br>
<br>
David R Huberman<br>
Microsoft Corporation<br>
Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)<br>
<br>
________________________________________<br>
From: <a>arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a> <<a>arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net</a>> on behalf of Michael Peddemors <<a>michael@linuxmagic.com</a>><br>
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:45:20 PM<br>
To: <a>arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Ip allocation<br>
<br>
Actually, this is timely, and you probably started at the right place, what would be needed though is for someone to write up a draft resolution to this affect, to change current policies.<br>
<br>
I was just talking to several parties regarding the same issue, and while there might have been justification in the past, when routing issues were a greater concern than running out of IPv4 space, but given the current situation, maybe it is time to rethink this policy.<br>
<br>
In the mean time, you are faced in getting two upstream providers to route to your prospective /22. I know, it doesn't make too much sense that the small guy should bear the burden of extra costs etc.. for being honest about his projected requirements..<br>
<br>
Any other support out there for policy changes in this area?<br>
<br>
On 14-04-28 04:33 PM, Derek Calanchini wrote:<br>
> Hello all, I will be brief as possible. I need assistance with either<br>
> requesting a policy change or an appeal/exception to current policy.<br>
><br>
> I started business in 1995 with 4 Class C's assigned from Integra (<br>
> /22 ). I am a full service IT provider offering pretty much<br>
> everything but connectivity. Over the years I have developed my<br>
> network such that I am using my IP's very efficiently. Host headers<br>
> on most web sites, internal IP's whenever possible, and of course<br>
> certain thing must be static, single IP's on a host.<br>
><br>
> I am moving in less then a year to a new office, and taking the<br>
> opportunity to get on the ATT fiber backbone rather then 4 bonded<br>
> T-1's from Integra (which is very expensive) Integra tells me I can<br>
> not take my IP's with me, and ATT tells me the largest block they will<br>
> give me is a single class C.<br>
><br>
> So I went out to Arin and setup my account and requested a /22 which<br>
> was denied because the smallest block they will give a single homed<br>
> ISP is a<br>
> /20 (4096 ip's)<br>
><br>
> I feel like I am being penalized for using my IP's efficiently!! As I<br>
> see it, I only have one option: Rework my network so every site I<br>
> host uses it's own dedicated IP so that I can justify needing a<br>
> /20...in which case I feel I would be doing the internet community a disservice.<br>
><br>
> Can anyone provided feedback on how to better resolve this? How do I<br>
> start getting the policy changed? Is there a process I can go through<br>
> to get an exemption? Would excalation my request be of any use?<br>
><br>
> With the IP 4 space dwindling, wouldn't it be a better policy to allow<br>
> small business to get only what they need?<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Derek Calanchini<br>
> Owner<br>
> Creative Network Solutions<br>
> Phone: 916-852-2890<br>
> Fax: 916-852-2899<br>
><br>
> "Adopt the metric system!"<br>
><br>
> CNS LOGO<br>
><br>
><br>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> --<br>
> <<a href="http://www.avast.com/" target="_blank">http://www.avast.com/</a>><br>
><br>
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus<br>
> <<a href="http://www.avast.com/" target="_blank">ht</a></blockquote></div></div></div></div>