<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">-Remove section 4.1.1 Routability - No Support, it leaves a clue as to how things can be done and there will always be v4 circling about<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Update section 4.1.5 Determination of resource requests - No support. Current text is sufficient. New text would work in addition to current text. This is an example of things getting word preferenced picked over. waste of time<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Remove section 4.1.7 RFC2050 -No support, Replace it with RFC 7020 and a reference to the section of NRPM with the adopted RIR principles. Im more comfortable with IETF references than ARIN policy since ARIN policy is a constantly moving
target. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Remove section 4.1.9 Returned IPv4 Addresses No support- Where did the details and reason go?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Replace and retitle section 4.2.4.3 Subscriber Members Less Than One Year Maybe support. If you fix it. Should say AND not OR. A business can purchase a business set in the same year they need to do a market transfer of addresses.
this should not be limited to either or as that is ignorant of how organizations can function. Replace with: (4.2.4.3 Request size) "ISPs may request up to a 3-month supply of IPv4 addresses from ARIN, or a 24-month supply via 8.3 "AND" 8.4 transfer."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Remove section 4.2.4.4. Subscriber Members After One Year NO support- Let Knew Entities grow.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>