<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
On Mar 9, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Matthew Petach <<a href="mailto:mpetach@netflight.com">mpetach@netflight.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Bill Darte <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:billdarte@gmail.com" target="_blank">billdarte@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>... </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font face="arial, sans-serif">3. T</font><span style="font-size:small">ake an alternative tack and simply restrict transfers on a per-block rather than a per-organization basis. e.g. 'No block acquired
within the past 24 months would be eligible for transfer.' (The time frame is of course an arbitrary number at this point.)</span></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>I support option #3.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I'm curious if it would be better to reference time<br>
</div>
<div>periods from other sections of the NRPM, rather<br>
than hard-coding a specific term here? IE, if we<br>
</div>
<div>limit transfer requests to a 24-month supply, then<br>
tie the anti-transfer period to be the same duration<br>
as the supply length, so that if we extend or contract<br>
the supply length for transfers, this anti-flip language<br>
</div>
<div>inherits the same change. This doesn't affect my<br>
support for option #3, I'm just looking to see if there's<br>
</div>
<div>ways we can limit the potential for the NRPM getting<br>
</div>
<div>'out of sync' with itself in the future, if we change one<br>
section but don't catch all the related sections like this.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div>Matt - </div>
<div> </div>
<div> It is possible to reference time periods from other policy sections of the NRPM,</div>
<div> or define such periods upfront in the definitions section and reference them later,</div>
<div> as the community prefers. Either approach should reduce possibility of mismatch</div>
<div> occurring as the result of future changes.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>FYI,</div>
<div>/John</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>John Curran</div>
<div>President and CEO</div>
<div>ARIN</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>