<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Draft policy 2014-1 attempts to solve a problem left over from last year. During 2013 there was a round of policy proposals attempting to tie ARIN allocations more closely to usage in the region. They failed to gain consensus because they
would have interfered with trans-regional networks in undesirable ways. Yet, current policy is still ambiguous on the issue of out of region use of ARIN registered resources. This proposal attempts to clear up that ambiguity in a way that avoids harmful effects
on transnational or trans-regional network operators. The gist of the idea is to allow out of region use for organizations eligible for ARIN resources, but also provide policy authorization for ARIN to charge fees to verify the identity or usage of applicants
outside the region. I think this approach provides the most flexibility while addressing the only real problems that have been cited for out of region use (verification issues).
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">You can see the proposal in full here: <a href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_1.html">
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_1.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Appreciate reading your comments about this.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Milton L Mueller<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Internet Governance Project<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://internetgovernance.org">http://internetgovernance.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>