<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Mike,<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Thanks for posting that. I found it largely indecipherable, but, I confess ignorance in both the math involved and the theoretical economics.</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I do find the assumption that the price of IPv4 addresses declines post exhaustion rather startling vs. the reality that everyone expects IPv4 addressing prices will increase until IPv4 is obsoleted.</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I find the spartan rule idea novel and interesting. I don't believe it is a viable substitute for needs-basis, but, I do believe it might be a worth-while additional constraint.</div><div><br></div><div>Owen</div><div><br><div><div>On Oct 10, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Mike Burns wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<div> </div>
<div>New HBS paper which may be of interest to this community seeks to offer
market flexibility while contraining table growth:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a title="http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-020.pdf" href="http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-020.pdf">http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-020.pdf</a></div>
<div> </div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br><a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>