<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6082" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><SPAN lang=EN>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=296371014-21062011>Hello,</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=296371014-21062011>Please provide you
immediate, concise feeback which states your position <U>for or against the DP
as changed</U> from its earlier version and any reasoning you may wish to
provide.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=296371014-21062011></SPAN></FONT><FONT
face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=296371014-21062011>I am proposing that the
original <A href="https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2011_1.html">Draft
Policy 2011-1: Globally Coordinated Transfer
Policy</A> ....</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=296371014-21062011>Be renamed.... Draft
Policy 2011-1: Inter-RIR Transfers...</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=296371014-21062011>and that the DP text
be modified to the following to accommodate the many insights and concerns
shared with me and the AC by members of the community and the AC
itself.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><SPAN class=296371014-21062011>"</SPAN>Address resources may be
transferred.... in or out of the ARIN region to those who demonstrate need and
plan to deploy them for a networking purpose within 3 months. Such transfers
will take place between RIRs who share compatible<SPAN
class=020093710-14062011>,</SPAN> needs-based policies on behalf of entities
agreeing to the transfer and which otherwise meet both RIR's policies.
Transferred resources will become part of the resource holdings of the recipient
RIR unless otherwise agreed by both RIRs.<SPAN
class=296371014-21062011>"</SPAN></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=020093710-14062011>Reasoning....</SPAN>It is explicit
about..</FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>in or out of region,<BR>that transfers are between
RIRs that support needs-based policies, <BR>that RIRs have to agree, <BR>that
parties meet all of both RIR policies <BR>that it is needs based, and the need
is for a networking purpose, <BR>that the receiving RIR is entitled to the
addresses</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think all these details were raised as objections
at one time or another...so it seems best to waste a few more words to be
explicit.</FONT></P>
<P><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><FONT face=Arial size=2>It is not explicit
about...<BR>block sizes<BR>utilization of prior allocations, assignments or
transfers<BR>RFC 2050<BR>subsequent transfers</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><FONT face=Arial size=2>Nor should it be,
IMO</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><SPAN class=296371014-21062011><FONT
face=Arial size=2>Thank you for your continuing involvement in the ARIN Policy
Development Process.</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><SPAN class=296371014-21062011><FONT
face=Arial size=2>Best,</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=020093710-14062011><SPAN class=296371014-21062011><FONT
face=Arial size=2>Bill Darte<BR>Primary Shepherd DP
2011-1</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></P></SPAN></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>