<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On May 23, 2011, at 17:17, Scott Leibrand <<a href="mailto:scottleibrand@gmail.com">scottleibrand@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mike Burns <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@nationwideinc.com"><a href="mailto:mike@nationwideinc.com">mike@nationwideinc.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Hi Scott,</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">In the context of this proposal, may I ask what
would happen if APNIC accepted a transfer of ARIN legacy addresses and updated
their Whois, even if ARIN refused the transfer?</font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I suppose what would matter in that case is who IANA pointed to. To date, we haven't seen cases where two different RIRs were both claiming authority for the same address block, and I don't expect to see that, as all of the RIRs are committed to operating within the "RIR system".</div>
<div> </div></div></div></blockquote><br>We did see it briefly with some ASNs and the two RIRs worked together to resolve the<div>issue. It was the result of an allocation error somewhere, but, it was a duplicate registration</div><div>issue.</div><div><br></div><div>Owen</div><div><br></div></body></html>