<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On May 13, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font>Agreed, we just had a proposal with significant support to return<br>address reclaimed to the free pool with a high expectation of<br>"faster", not slower. I don't see why this would be any different<br>hence I expect a lack of community support. In fact, I think that the<br>author should consider withdrawing this to save us all some time.<br><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I am withdrawing ARIN-prop-150.</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>We need to leave this as an administrative decision influenced by the<br>community vs. a rule. This is an example of not knowing what you might<br>not know.<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Agree that this should be handled via ASCP rather than as a policy change to the NRPM.</div><div><br></div><div>I believe the discussion on the list has been enlightening in that some want a much shorter hold period, some want a much longer hold period, and almost nobody wants the hold period we currently have.</div><div><br></div><div>Matthew Kaufman</div></body></html>