<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Proposal 2011-1 - Comments request - Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6082" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText62120 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Thanks Bill.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>This is excellent feedback and gives a very concise starting point for more discussion.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Others? Please follow's Bill's lead here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>For or Against...as is</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>What could be improved with the original...or Bill's very understandable alternative.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks to all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>bd-</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> wherrin@gmail.com on behalf of William Herrin<BR><B>Sent:</B> Fri 5/13/2011 5:08 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Bill Darte<BR><B>Cc:</B> arin ppml<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Proposal 2011-1 - Comments request - Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Bill Darte <BillD@cait.wustl.edu> wrote:<BR>> The policy text reviewed at the meeting was as follows:<BR>> Any RIR's resource registrant may transfer IPv4 addresses to the resource<BR>> registrant of another RIR as long as the two RIRs agree and maintain<BR>> compatible, needs-based transfer policies that exercise Internet stewardship<BR>> consistent with the values expressed in RFC2050.<BR>><BR>> 1. Identify support or objection<BR><BR>Hi Bill,<BR><BR>Oppose.<BR><BR>> 2. If objections exist, to succinctly identify what they are..and,<BR><BR>a. I'm not convinced we should be contemplating inter-region transfers<BR>prior to ARIN's free pool exhausting.<BR>b. I'm not convinced *any* of the 5 RIRs adhere to RFC2050's "values"<BR>except in a very loose way... which makes it a weak and subjective<BR>place to hang a policy.<BR><BR><BR>> 3. How objections might be concisely remedied in text<BR><BR>"ARIN shall permit the transfer of IPv4 addresses between ARIN<BR>registrants and registrants of other RIRs provided that:<BR><BR>a. Both ARIN and the other RIR agree to the transfer,<BR>b. ARIN and the other RIR have functionally reciprocal inter-region<BR>transfer policies, and<BR>c. Both the offering and receiving registrants qualify for the<BR>transfer under ARIN's normal intra-region resource transfer policies<BR>save that one of the registrants is not in the ARIN region and will<BR>therefore not be under contract to ARIN."<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Bill Herrin<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us<BR>3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <<A href="http://bill.herrin.us/">http://bill.herrin.us/</A>><BR>Falls Church, VA 22042-3004<BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>